Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25994199›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2016

256-Slice coronary computed tomographic angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: optimal reconstruction phase and image quality.

Seitaro Oda, Keiichi Honda, Akira Yoshimura, Kazuhiro Katahira, Katsuo Noda, Shuichi Oshima, Hideaki Yuki, Masafumi Kidoh, Daisuke Utsunomiya, Takeshi Nakaura and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Seitaro OdaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjyo, Chuou-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan. seisei0430@nifty.com.
Keiichi HondaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Kumamoto Chuo Hospital, 1-5-1 Tainoshima, Minami-ku, Kumamoto, 862-0965, Japan.
Akira YoshimuraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Kumamoto Chuo Hospital, 1-5-1 Tainoshima, Minami-ku, Kumamoto, 862-0965, Japan.
Kazuhiro KatahiraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Kumamoto Chuo Hospital, 1-5-1 Tainoshima, Minami-ku, Kumamoto, 862-0965, Japan.
Katsuo NodaDepartment of Cardiology, Kumamoto Chuo Hospital, 1-5-1 Tainoshima, Minami-ku, Kumamoto, 862-0965, Japan.
Shuichi OshimaDepartment of Cardiology, Kumamoto Chuo Hospital, 1-5-1 Tainoshima, Minami-ku, Kumamoto, 862-0965, Japan.
Hideaki YukiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjyo, Chuou-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Masafumi KidohDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjyo, Chuou-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Daisuke UtsunomiyaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjyo, Chuou-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Takeshi NakauraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjyo, Chuou-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Tomohiro NamimotoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjyo, Chuou-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Yasuyuki YamashitaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjyo, Chuou-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the optimal reconstruction phase and the image quality of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

methodsWe performed CCTA in 60 patients with AF and 60 controls with sinus rhythm. The images were reconstructed in multiple phases in all parts of the cardiac cycle, and the optimal reconstruction phase with the fewest motion artefacts was identified. The coronary artery segments were visually evaluated to investigate their assessability.

resultsIn 46 (76.7 %) patients, the optimal reconstruction phase was end-diastole, whereas in 6 (10.0 %) patients it was end-systole or mid-diastole, and in 2 (3.3 %) patients it was another cardiac phase. In 53 (88.3 %) of the controls, the optimal reconstruction phase was mid-diastole, whereas it was end-systole in 4 (6.7 %), and in 3 (5.0 %) it was another cardiac phase. There was a significant difference between patients with AF and the controls in the optimal phase (p < 0.01) but not in the visual image quality score (p = 0.06).

conclusionsThe optimal reconstruction phase in most patients with AF was the end-diastolic phase. The end-systolic phase tended to be optimal in AF patients with higher average heart rates. KEY POINTS: The optimal reconstruction phase in 76.7 % of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) was end-diastole. The end-systolic phase was optimal in AF patients with higher heart rates. ECG and heart-rate control are necessary to obtain end-diastolic images with fewer motion artefacts.

Indexed as

AgedArtifactsAtrial FibrillationCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsDiastoleFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyProspective StudiesSystoleAtrial fibrillationCoronary CT angiographyImage qualityMotion artefactOptimal reconstruction phase

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.