Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25994193›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2015

Thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases: a position paper by an international panel of ablation experts, The Interventional Oncology Sans Frontières meeting 2013.

Alice Gillams, Nahum Goldberg, Muneeb Ahmed, Reto Bale, David Breen, Matthew Callstrom, Min Hua Chen, Byung Ihn Choi, Thierry de Baere, Damian Dupuy and 21 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus StatementSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 155 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 314 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Missing colorectal liver metastases: the surgical challenge.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. [Surgical treatment of metastatic liver cancer: the biological-behavioral basis of "homotherapy for heteropathy"].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Differential effects of theWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 20 institutions in 9 countries.

Alice GillamsImaging Department, The London Clinic, 20 Devonshire Place, London, W1G 6BW, UK. alliesorting@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9118-0112
Nahum GoldbergBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA.
Muneeb AhmedBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA.
Reto BaleInnsbruck University Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria.
David BreenSouthampton University Hospital, Southampton, UK.
Matthew CallstromThe Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Min Hua ChenPeking University Hospital, Beijing, China.
Byung Ihn ChoiSeoul University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Thierry de Baere, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Paris, France.
Damian Dupuy, Rhode Island, RI, USA.
Afshin GangiUniversity of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Debra GervaisMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Thomas HelmbergerKlinikum Bochenhausen, Munich, Germany.
Ernst-Michael JungUniversity of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Fred LeeUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Riccardo LencioniUniversity of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Ping LiangChinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tito LivraghiClinical Institute Humanitas, Rozzano Milano, Milan, Italy.
David LuUCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Franca MeloniUniversity of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Philippe PereiraUniversity of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Fabio PiscagliaUniversity of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Hyunchul RhimSungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Riad SalemNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Constantinos SofocleousMemorial Sloane Kettering, New York, NY, USA.
Stephen B SolomonMemorial Sloane Kettering, New York, NY, USA.
Michael SoulenUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Masatoshi TanakaYokokura Hospital, Miyama, Japan.
Thomas VoglUniversity of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Brad WoodNational Institute for Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Luigi Solbiati, Busto Arsizio, Italy.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCalifornia University of Pennsylvania · USChinese PLA General Hospital · CNGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHarvard University Press · USHeidelberg University · DEHumanitas University · ITInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRLondon Clinic · GBMayo Clinic · USMünchen Klinik Bogenhausen · DENational Institutes of Health · USNorthwestern University · USOspedale di Circolo di Busto Arsizio · ITPeking University · CNRhode Island Department of Health · USShinKokura Hospital · JPSungkyunkwan University · KRUniversité de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

Tumor Environment and Metastasis (TEAM) Research ProgramP30CA060553 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Daniela E Matei · 1993 to 2026
$153.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA060553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrevious attempts at meta-analysis and systematic review have not provided clear recommendations for the clinical application of thermal ablation in metastatic colorectal cancer. Many authors believe that the probability of gathering randomised controlled trial (RCT) data is low. Our aim is to provide a consensus document making recommendations on the appropriate application of thermal ablation in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

methodsThis consensus paper was discussed by an expert panel at The Interventional Oncology Sans Frontières 2013. A literature review was presented. Tumour characteristics, ablation technique and different clinical applications were considered and the level of consensus was documented.

resultsSpecific recommendations are made with regard to metastasis size, number, and location and ablation technique. Mean 31 % 5-year survival post-ablation in selected patients has resulted in acceptance of this therapy for those with technically inoperable but limited liver disease and those with limited liver reserve or co-morbidities that render them inoperable.

conclusionsIn the absence of RCT data, it is our aim that this consensus document will facilitate judicious selection of the patients most likely to benefit from thermal ablation and provide a unified interventional oncological perspective for the use of this technology. KEY POINTS: • Best results require due consideration of tumour size, number, volume and location. • Ablation technology, imaging guidance and intra-procedural imaging assessment must be optimised. • Accepted applications include inoperable disease due to tumour distribution or inadequate liver reserve. • Other current indications include concurrent co-morbidity, patient choice and the test-of-time approach. • Future applications may include resectable disease, e.g. for small solitary tumours.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesColorectal NeoplasmsHumansLiver NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisAblation techniquesClinical protocolsColorectal neoplasmsConsensusLiver neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID25994193
PMCPMC4636513
OpenAlexW218054953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.