Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25994091›Full record

Observational studyRheumatology international2015

Dose reduction of biological treatment in patients with axial spondyloarthritis in clinical remission: Are there any differences between patients who relapsed and to those who remained in low disease activity?

Miriam Almirall, Tarek Carlos Salman-Monte, Maria Pilar Lisbona, Joan Maymó

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Rheumatology international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miriam AlmirallDepartment of Rheumatology, Parc de Salut Mar, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain, REU0802@parcdesalutmar.cat.
Tarek Carlos Salman-Monte
Maria Pilar Lisbona
Joan Maymó
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESParc de Salut · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess whether dose reduction of biological treatment in patients with axial spondyloarthritis in sustained remission could be effective to maintain remission or low disease activity at 1 year and to explore baseline differences between patients who remained in remission or low disease activity and patients who relapsed. This was a prospective, observational study. All consecutive patients with axial spondyloarthritis in sustained remission were included and received low doses of anti-TNF-α according to a dose reduction protocol. At 1 year, the percentage of patients in remission or low disease activity and in relapse and the differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups were calculated. Of forty-two patients, 76.2 % remained in remission or low disease activity at 1 year. A significant shorter duration of remission before dose reduction, shorter duration of biological treatment and shorter disease duration were observed in the relapse group. Most of our patients with axial spondyloarthritis remained in remission or low disease activity at 1 year after dosage reduction of biologics and shorter duration of remission, shorter duration of biological treatment and shorter disease duration discriminated the patients who relapsed.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiological ProductsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecurrenceRemission InductionSeverity of Illness IndexSpondylarthritisTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID25994091
OpenAlexW232061653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.