Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25993334›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Differences in the strength of cortical and brainstem inputs to SSA and non-SSA neurons in the inferior colliculus.

Yaneri A Ayala, Adanna Udeh, Kelsey Dutta, Deborah Bishop, Manuel S Malmierca, Douglas L Oliver

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cell-type-specific enhancement of deviance detection by synaptic zinc in the mouse auditory cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Adaptation in auditory processing.Physiological reviews · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Neuronal Organization in the Inferior Colliculus Revisited with Cell-Type-Dependent Monosynaptic Tracing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  18. [Effects of auditory response patterns on stimulus-specific adaptation of inferior colliculus neurons in awake mice].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yaneri A AyalaAuditory Neurophysiology Laboratory. Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla Y León, University of Salamanca, C/Pintor Fernando Gallego, 1, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Adanna UdehDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-3401, USA.
Kelsey DuttaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-3401, USA.
Deborah BishopDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-3401, USA.
Manuel S Malmierca1] Auditory Neurophysiology Laboratory. Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla Y León, University of Salamanca, C/Pintor Fernando Gallego, 1, 37007 Salamanca, Spain [2] Department of Neuroscience, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-3401, USA [3] Department of Cell Biology and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Douglas L OliverDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-3401, USA.
UConn Health · USUniversidad de Salamanca · ES

Funding

SYNAPTIC ORGANIZATION OF THE AUDITORY SYSTEMR01DC000189 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI OLIVER, DOUGLAS L · 1989 to 2013
$5.3M
Synaptic Plasticity in the Inferior ColliculusR21DC013822 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI OLIVER, DOUGLAS L · 2015 to 2016
$438k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000189NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC000189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an ever changing auditory scene, change detection is an ongoing task performed by the auditory brain. Neurons in the midbrain and auditory cortex that exhibit stimulus-specific adaptation (SSA) may contribute to this process. Those neurons adapt to frequent sounds while retaining their excitability to rare sounds. Here, we test whether neurons exhibiting SSA and those without are part of the same networks in the inferior colliculus (IC). We recorded the responses to frequent and rare sounds and then marked the sites of these neurons with a retrograde tracer to correlate the source of projections with the physiological response. SSA neurons were confined to the non-lemniscal subdivisions and exhibited broad receptive fields, while the non-SSA were confined to the central nucleus and displayed narrow receptive fields. SSA neurons receive strong inputs from auditory cortical areas and very poor or even absent projections from the brainstem nuclei. On the contrary, the major sources of inputs to the neurons that lacked SSA were from the brainstem nuclei. These findings demonstrate that auditory cortical inputs are biased in favor of IC synaptic domains that are populated by SSA neurons enabling them to compare top-down signals with incoming sensory information from lower areas.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsAuditory CortexBrainBrain MappingElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleImmunohistochemistryInferior ColliculiNeuronsPhotomicrographyRatsRats, Long-Evans

Identifiers

PMID25993334
PMCPMC4438612
OpenAlexW842024128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.