Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25992778›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2015

Model-Free RNA Sequence and Structure Alignment Informed by SHAPE Probing Reveals a Conserved Alternate Secondary Structure for 16S rRNA.

Christopher A Lavender, Ronny Lorenz, Ge Zhang, Rita Tamayo, Ivo L Hofacker, Kevin M Weeks

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Markov models of SHAPE data improve secondary structure prediction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Machine learning a model for RNA structure prediction.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. High-throughput determination of RNA structures.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Christopher A LavenderDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Ronny LorenzInstitute for Theoretical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Bioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Ge ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Rita TamayoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Ivo L HofackerInstitute for Theoretical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Kevin M WeeksDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

Yessinia autotransporters (Yaps): Structure, function, and host responseU54AI057157 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GOLDMAN, WILLIAM E · 2003 to 2013
$91.4M
Structure of the HIV-1 GenomeR01AI068462 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WEEKS, KEVIN M · 2006 to 2020
$7.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI068462NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057157NIAID NIH HHS U54-AI057157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovery and characterization of functional RNA structures remains challenging due to deficiencies in de novo secondary structure modeling. Here we describe a dynamic programming approach for model-free sequence comparison that incorporates high-throughput chemical probing data. Based on SHAPE probing data alone, ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) from three diverse organisms--the eubacteria E. coli and C. difficile and the archeon H. volcanii--could be aligned with accuracies comparable to alignments based on actual sequence identity. When both base sequence identity and chemical probing reactivities were considered together, accuracies improved further. Derived sequence alignments and chemical probing data from protein-free RNAs were then used as pseudo-free energy constraints to model consensus secondary structures for the 16S and 23S rRNAs. There are critical differences between these experimentally-informed models and currently accepted models, including in the functionally important neck and decoding regions of the 16S rRNA. We infer that the 16S rRNA has evolved to undergo large-scale changes in base pairing as part of ribosome function. As high-quality RNA probing data become widely available, structurally-informed sequence alignment will become broadly useful for de novo motif and function discovery.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationBase SequenceClostridioides difficileComputational BiologyEscherichia coliHaloferax volcaniiHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataRNA, ArchaealRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, RNARNA, ArchaealRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID25992778
PMCPMC4438973
OpenAlexW1584395599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.