Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25992722›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2015

Cell shape dynamics reveal balance of elasticity and contractility in peripheral arcs.

Céline Labouesse, Alexander B Verkhovsky, Jean-Jacques Meister, Chiara Gabella, Benoît Vianay

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Profiling DNA damage in 3D Histology Samples.Medical optical imaging and virtual microscopy image analysis : first International Workshop, MOVI 2022, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2022, Singapore, September 18, 2022, Proceedings. MOVI (Workshop) (1st : 2022 : Singapore) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Balancing forces in migration.Current opinion in cell biology · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Céline LabouesseLaboratory of Cell Biophysics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: celine.labouesse@epfl.ch.
Alexander B VerkhovskyLaboratory of Cell Biophysics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Jacques MeisterLaboratory of Cell Biophysics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Chiara GabellaLaboratory of Cell Biophysics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Benoît VianayLaboratory of Cell Biophysics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanical interaction between adherent cells and their substrate relies on the formation of adhesion sites and on the stabilization of contractile acto-myosin bundles, or stress fibers. The shape of the cell and the orientation of these fibers can be controlled by adhesive patterning. On nonadhesive gaps, fibroblasts develop thick peripheral stress fibers, with a concave curvature. The radius of curvature of these arcs results from the balance of the line tension in the arc and of the surface tension in the cell bulk. However, the nature of these forces, and in particular the contribution of myosin-dependent contractility, is not clear. To get insight into the force balance, we inhibit myosin activity and simultaneously monitor the dynamics of peripheral arc radii and traction forces. We use these measurements to estimate line and surface tension. We found that myosin inhibition led to a decrease in the traction forces and an increase in arc radius, indicating that both line tension and surface tension dropped, but the line tension decreased to a lesser extent than surface tension. These results suggest that myosin-independent force contributes to tension in the peripheral arcs. We propose a simple physical model in which the peripheral arc line tension is due to the combination of myosin II contractility and a passive elastic component, while surface tension is largely due to active contractility. Numerical solutions of this model reproduce well the experimental data and allow estimation of the contributions of elasticity and contractility to the arc line tension.

Indexed as

Cell ShapeElasticityAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell AdhesionCell LineFibroblastsModels, BiologicalMyosinsRatsStress FibersMyosins

Identifiers

PMID25992722
PMCPMC4457271
OpenAlexW2097187261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.