Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25992709›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Genome-Wide Association Analyses Point to Candidate Genes for Electric Shock Avoidance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Mirjam Appel, Claus-Jürgen Scholz, Tobias Müller, Marcus Dittrich, Christian König, Marie Bockstaller, Tuba Oguz, Afshin Khalili, Emmanuel Antwi-Adjei, Tamas Schauer and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The road less traveled: from genotype to phenotype in flies and humans.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mirjam AppelResearch Group Molecular Systems Biology of Learning, Leibniz Institute of Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany; Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany.
Claus-Jürgen ScholzLaboratory for Microarray Applications, IZKF, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Tobias MüllerDepartment of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Marcus DittrichDepartment of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Institute of Human Genetics, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Christian KönigResearch Group Molecular Systems Biology of Learning, Leibniz Institute of Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Marie BockstallerMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany.
Tuba OguzMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany.
Afshin KhaliliResearch Group Molecular Systems Biology of Learning, Leibniz Institute of Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Emmanuel Antwi-AdjeiResearch Group Molecular Systems Biology of Learning, Leibniz Institute of Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Tamas SchauerDepartment of Physiological Chemistry, Butenandt Institute and LMU Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Carla MarguliesDepartment of Physiological Chemistry, Butenandt Institute and LMU Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hiromu TanimotoMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany; Tohoku University Graduate School of Life Sciences, Sendai, Japan.
Ayse YaraliResearch Group Molecular Systems Biology of Learning, Leibniz Institute of Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany; Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electric shock is a common stimulus for nociception-research and the most widely used reinforcement in aversive associative learning experiments. Yet, nothing is known about the mechanisms it recruits at the periphery. To help fill this gap, we undertook a genome-wide association analysis using 38 inbred Drosophila melanogaster strains, which avoided shock to varying extents. We identified 514 genes whose expression levels and/ or sequences co-varied with shock avoidance scores. We independently scrutinized 14 of these genes using mutants, validating the effect of 7 of them on shock avoidance. This emphasizes the value of our candidate gene list as a guide for follow-up research. In addition, by integrating our association results with external protein-protein interaction data we obtained a shock avoidance-associated network of 38 genes. Both this network and the original candidate list contained a substantial number of genes that affect mechanosensory bristles, which are hair-like organs distributed across the fly's body. These results may point to a potential role for mechanosensory bristles in shock sensation. Thus, we not only provide a first list of candidate genes for shock avoidance, but also point to an interesting new hypothesis on nociceptive mechanisms.

Indexed as

Avoidance LearningElectroshockGenetic Association StudiesGenome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila melanogasterGene DeletionGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksLocomotionMutagenesis, InsertionalReproducibility of ResultsDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID25992709
PMCPMC4436303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.