Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25992368›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2015

The evolution of image-guided lumbosacral spine surgery.

Austin C Bourgeois, Austin R Faulkner, Alexander S Pasciak, Yong C Bradley

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Navigation Techniques in Endoscopic Spine Surgery.BioMed research international · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A multi-center milestone study of clinical vertebral CT segmentation.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2016
    Article
  15. Pedicle screw placement accuracy in thoracic and lumbar spinal surgery with a patient-matched targeting guide: a cadaveric study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Austin C Bourgeois1 University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medical Education, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Knoxville, TN 37919, USA ; 2 Department of Radiology, University of Tennessee Medical Center, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Knoxville, TN 37919, USA.
Austin R Faulkner1 University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medical Education, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Knoxville, TN 37919, USA ; 2 Department of Radiology, University of Tennessee Medical Center, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Knoxville, TN 37919, USA.
Alexander S Pasciak1 University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medical Education, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Knoxville, TN 37919, USA ; 2 Department of Radiology, University of Tennessee Medical Center, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Knoxville, TN 37919, USA.
Yong C Bradley1 University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medical Education, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Knoxville, TN 37919, USA ; 2 Department of Radiology, University of Tennessee Medical Center, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Knoxville, TN 37919, USA.
University of Tennessee Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Techniques and approaches of spinal fusion have considerably evolved since their first description in the early 1900s. The incorporation of pedicle screw constructs into lumbosacral spine surgery is among the most significant advances in the field, offering immediate stability and decreased rates of pseudarthrosis compared to previously described methods. However, early studies describing pedicle screw fixation and numerous studies thereafter have demonstrated clinically significant sequelae of inaccurate surgical fusion hardware placement. A number of image guidance systems have been developed to reduce morbidity from hardware malposition in increasingly complex spine surgeries. Advanced image guidance systems such as intraoperative stereotaxis improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement using a variety of surgical approaches, however their clinical indications and clinical impact remain debated. Beginning with intraoperative fluoroscopy, this article describes the evolution of image guided lumbosacral spinal fusion, emphasizing two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) navigational methods.

Indexed as

minimally invasive surgerypedicle screwsSpinesurgery

Identifiers

PMID25992368
PMCPMC4402607
OpenAlexW2213371616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.