Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25992279›Full record

ArticlePulmonary circulation2015

Acute hemodynamic effects of nebulized iloprost via the I-neb Adaptive Aerosol Delivery system in pulmonary hypertension.

Manuel J Richter, Hossein A Ghofrani, Robert Voswinckel, Werner Seeger, Richard Schulz, Frank Reichenberger, Henning Gall

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Bronchodilation induced by PGEBritish journal of pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  4. Devices for Improved Delivery of Nebulized Pharmaceutical Aerosols to the Lungs.Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manuel J RichterDepartment of Pneumology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thoracic Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany ; Department of Internal Medicine, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center, Germany, and German Center for Lung Research.
Hossein A GhofraniDepartment of Pneumology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thoracic Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany ; Department of Internal Medicine, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center, Germany, and German Center for Lung Research.
Robert VoswinckelDepartment of Pneumology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thoracic Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany ; Department of Internal Medicine, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center, Germany, and German Center for Lung Research ; Department of Lung Development and Remodeling, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Werner SeegerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center, Germany, and German Center for Lung Research ; Department of Lung Development and Remodeling, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Richard SchulzDepartment of Internal Medicine, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center, Germany, and German Center for Lung Research.
Frank ReichenbergerDepartment of Pneumology, Asklepios Hospital, Munich-Gauting, Germany, and German Center for Lung Research.
Henning GallDepartment of Internal Medicine, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center, Germany, and German Center for Lung Research.
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEAsklepios Fachkliniken München-Gauting · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhaled iloprost has proven to be an effective therapy in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, the acute hemodynamic effect of nebulized iloprost delivered via the I-neb Adaptive Aerosol Delivery (AAD) system remains unclear and needs to be assessed. In this study, 126 patients with PH were classified according to current guidelines (59, 34, 29, and 4 patients in groups 1/1', 3, 4, and 5, respectively; 20 patients had idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension [iPAH]), were randomly assigned to inhale iloprost 2.5 [Formula: see text]g (n = 67) or 5.0 [Formula: see text]g (n = 59) via the I-neb AAD system, and were assessed by right heart catheterization. In seven patients with iPAH, iloprost plasma levels were measured. The two iloprost doses caused decreases from baseline in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR; 2.5 [Formula: see text]g: -14.7%; 5.0 [Formula: see text]g: -15.6%) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP; 2.5 [Formula: see text]g: -11.0%; 5.0 [Formula: see text]g: -10.1%) while cardiac index (CI) increased (2.5 [Formula: see text]g: +6.5%; 5.0 [Formula: see text]g: +6.4%). The subset with iPAH also showed decreases from baseline in PVR and mPAP and an increase in CI. Peak iloprost plasma levels showed no significant difference after inhalation of 2.5 [Formula: see text]g or 5.0 [Formula: see text]g iloprost (95.5 pg/mL vs. 73.0 pg/mL; P = 0.06). In summary, nebulized iloprost delivered via the I-neb AAD system reduced mPAP and PVR and increased CI from baseline in a heterogeneous group of patients with PH and in the subset with iPAH. In patients with iPAH, inhalation of 2.5 [Formula: see text]g or 5.0 [Formula: see text]g iloprost resulted in broadly similar peak iloprost plasma levels.

Indexed as

I-neb Adaptive Aerosol Delivery systeminhaled iloprostpulmonary arterial hypertension

Identifiers

PMID25992279
PMCPMC4405724
OpenAlexW2079922798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.