ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2015
Role of stenting in gastrointestinal benign and malignant diseases.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Endoscopic Management of Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Anastomosis Strictures: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Literature.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Nanotechnology-based biomedical devices in the cancer diagnostics and therapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Inflammation accelerating intestinal fibrosis: from mechanism to clinic.European journal of medical research · 2024Review
- Stricturing Crohn's disease: what is the role of endoscopic stenting? A systematic review.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Endoscopic luminal stenting: Current applications and future perspectives.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023Review
- Article
- Endoscopic Management of Luminal Strictures: Beyond Dilation.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Review
- Endoscopic management of post-surgical GI wall defects with the overstitch endosuturing system: a single-center experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Observational
- Success and safety of endoscopic treatments for concomitant biliary and duodenal malignant stenosis: A review of the literature.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2019Review
- A Review of Self-Expanding Esophageal Stents for the Palliation Therapy of Inoperable Esophageal Malignancies.BioMed research international · 2019Review
- Comparative Study of Esophageal Self-expandable Metallic Stent Insertion and Gastrostomy Feeding for Dysphagia Caused by Lung Cancer.The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2018Article
- Successful endoscopic removal of three embedded esophageal self-expanding metal stents.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2017Article
- Mechanisms, Management, and Treatment of Fibrosis in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.Gastroenterology · 2017Review
- Update on Enteral Stents.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in stents design have led to a substantial increase in the use of stents for a variety of digestive diseases. Initially developed as a non-surgical treatment for palliation of esophageal cancer, the stents now have an emerging role in the management of malignant and benign conditions as well as in all segments of the gastrointestinal tract. In this review, relevant literature search and expert opinions have been used to evaluate the key-role of stenting in gastrointestinal benign and malignant diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.