Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25991444›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

A search strategy to identify studies on the prognosis of work disability: a diagnostic test framework.

Rob Kok, Jos A H M Verbeek, Babs Faber, Frank J H van Dijk, Jan L Hoving

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rob KokResearch Center for Insurance Medicine AMC-UMCG-UWV-VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jos A H M VerbeekSurveillance and Reviews Team, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Kuopio, Finland.
Babs FaberResearch Center for Insurance Medicine AMC-UMCG-UWV-VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank J H van DijkResearch Center for Insurance Medicine AMC-UMCG-UWV-VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan L HovingResearch Center for Insurance Medicine AMC-UMCG-UWV-VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NLFinnish Institute of Occupational Health · FINetherlands Center for Occupational Diseases · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSearching the medical literature for evidence on prognosis is an important aspect of evidence-based disability evaluation. To facilitate this, we aimed to develop and evaluate a comprehensive and efficient search strategy in PubMed, to be used by either researchers or practitioners and that will identify articles on the prognosis of work disability.

methodsWe used a diagnostic test analytic framework. First, we created a reference set of 225 articles on the prognosis of work disability by screening a total of 65,692 titles and abstracts from10 journals in the period 2000-2009. Included studies had a minimum follow-up of 6 months, participants in the age of 18-64 with a minimum sick leave of 4 weeks or longer or having serious activity limitations in 50% of the cases and outcome measures that reflect impairments, activity limitations or participation restrictions. Using text mining methods, we extracted search terms from the reference set and, according to sensitivity and relative frequency, we combined these into search strings.

resultsBoth the research and the practice search filter outperformed existing filters in occupational health, all combined with the Yale-prognostic filter. The Work Disability Prognosis filter for Research showed a comprehensiveness of 90% (95% CI 86 to 94) and efficiency expressed more user-friendly as Number Needed to Read=20 (95% CI 17 to 34).

conclusionsThe Work Disability Prognosis filter will help practitioners and researchers who want to find prognostic evidence in the area of work disability evaluation. However, further refining of this filter is possible and needed, especially for the practitioner for whom efficiency is especially important.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationInformation Seeking BehaviorMEDLINEOccupational HealthResearchSick LeaveDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansPersons with DisabilitiesPractice Patterns, Physicians'PrognosisEPIDEMIOLOGYOCCUPATIONAL & INDUSTRIAL MEDICINEPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID25991444
PMCPMC4442145
OpenAlexW1830935221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.