Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25991413›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS2015

Relationship of contextual cueing and hippocampal volume in amnestic mild cognitive impairment patients and cognitively normal older adults.

Selam Negash, Daria Kliot, Darlene V Howard, James H Howard, Sandhistu R Das, Paul A Yushkevich, John B Pluta, Steven E Arnold, David A Wolk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The past, present, and future of selection history.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Habitual versus goal-driven attention.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Selam Negash1Department of Psychiatry,University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
Daria Kliot3Department of Neurology,University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
Darlene V Howard4Georgetown University,Washington,DC.
James H Howard4Georgetown University,Washington,DC.
Sandhistu R Das6Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory,Department of Radiology,University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia,Pennsylvania.
Paul A Yushkevich6Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory,Department of Radiology,University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia,Pennsylvania.
John B Pluta6Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory,Department of Radiology,University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia,Pennsylvania.
Steven E Arnold1Department of Psychiatry,University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
David A Wolk2Penn Memory Center,University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia Pennsylvania.

Funding

UPenn ADCC Biomarker CoreP30AG010124 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI XIE, SHARON XIANGWEN · 1991 to 2020
$35.1M
Aging and the Cognitive and Neural Bases of Implicit Associative LearningR01AG036863 · NIA · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI HOWARD, DARLENE V., HOWARD, JAMES H. · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
Recollection and Familiarity in Amnestic-Mild Cognitive ImpairmentK23AG028018 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WOLK, DAVID A · 2006 to 2010
$766k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG028018NIA NIH HHS K23-AG028018NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010124NIA NIH HHS P30-AG010124NIA NIH HHS R01 AG036863NIA NIH HHS R01AG036863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is currently some debate as to whether hippocampus mediates contextual cueing. In the present study, we examined contextual cueing in patients diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and healthy older adults, with the main goal of investigating the role of hippocampus in this form of learning. Amnestic MCI (aMCI) patients and healthy controls completed the contextual cueing task, in which they were asked to search for a target (a horizontal T) in an array of distractors (rotated L's). Unbeknownst to them, the spatial arrangement of elements on some displays was repeated thus making the configuration a contextual cue to the location of the target. In contrast, the configuration for novel displays was generated randomly on each trial. The difference in response times between repeated and novel configurations served as a measure of contextual learning. aMCI patients, as a group, were able to learn spatial contextual cues as well as healthy older adults. However, better learning on this task was associated with higher hippocampal volume, particularly in right hemisphere. Furthermore, contextual cueing performance was significantly associated with hippocampal volume, even after controlling for age and MCI status. These findings support the role of the hippocampus in learning of spatial contexts, and also suggest that the contextual cueing paradigm can be useful in detecting neuropathological changes associated with the hippocampus.

Indexed as

CuesAgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceAssociation LearningCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHippocampusHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsReaction TimeAlzheimer’s diseaseCA1Cognitive agingImplicitMRISpatial learning

Identifiers

PMID25991413
PMCPMC4596722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.