Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25990547›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2016

Evaluation outcomes of a long-running adult nutrition education programme.

Simone Pettigrew, Sarah Moore, Iain S Pratt, Michelle Jongenelis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identifying Who Improves or Maintains Their Food Literacy Behaviours after Completing an Adult Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. A Recipe for Success? A Nutrient Analysis of Recipes Promoted by Supermarkets.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Charitable Food Systems' Capacity to Address Food Insecurity: An Australian Capital City Audit.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simone Pettigrew1School of Psychology and Speech Pathology,Curtin University,GPO Box U1987,Perth,WA 6845,Australia.
Sarah Moore2Cancer Council Western Australia,Perth,Australia.
Iain S Pratt2Cancer Council Western Australia,Perth,Australia.
Michelle Jongenelis1School of Psychology and Speech Pathology,Curtin University,GPO Box U1987,Perth,WA 6845,Australia.
Cancer Council Western Australia · AUCurtin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFor more than 20 years, the FOODcents adult nutrition education programme has been delivered to Western Australians. The aim of the programme is to provide disadvantaged individuals with the knowledge, skills and motivation to buy healthy foods on a limited budget. The present study evaluated whether the FOODcents curriculum and the way it is delivered are effective in improving participants' nutrition-related knowledge and behaviours.

designEvaluation data were collected via in-session pre-post questionnaires and a post-course online questionnaire.

settingWestern Australia. SUBJECTS: Data were collected from participants attending just over one-half (54 %) of the FOODcents courses conducted over the two-year evaluation period. In total, 927 course participants provided usable data.

resultsAfter exposure to the course, respondents demonstrated an improved ability to: (i) categorize foods according to the frequency with which they should be consumed and the proportion of the food budget that should be allocated to them; (ii) correctly interpret nutrition labels on food products; and (iii) appreciate the link between diet/obesity and a range of diseases. Improvements in the latter were especially pronounced among participants of low socio-economic status. In terms of behaviour change, significant improvements in fruit and vegetable consumption were reported, along with reductions in the consumption of fast food. Participants of low socio-economic status reported the greatest changes.

conclusionsThe results indicate that the FOODcents nutrition education programme improves participants' nutrition-related knowledge and behaviours.

Indexed as

DietHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeProgram EvaluationAdultCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleSocial ClassSurveys and QuestionnairesWestern AustraliaBehaviour changeNutrition educationProgramme evaluationSocio-economic status

Identifiers

PMID25990547
PMCPMC10270826
OpenAlexW2272406428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.