ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2015
How far from correct is the use of adrenaline auto-injectors? A survey in Italian patients.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05404165 (Relevance of the Self-assessment of Skills for Self-administration of Adrenaline by Auto-injectors in Patients at Risk of Severe Anaphylactic Reaction), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Relevance of the Self-assessment of Skills for Self-administration of Adrenaline by Auto-injectors in Patients at Risk of Severe Anaphylactic Reaction
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Significant handling errors and education gaps regarding the use of the emergency kit among adult patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy.Allergologie select · 2025Article
- Improving epinephrine autoinjector usability and carriage frequency among patients at risk of anaphylaxis: a quality improvement initiative.BMJ open quality · 2022Article
- Lipid transfer protein syndrome: How to save a life through careful education.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2022Article
- Intranasal epinephrine effects on epinephrine pharmacokinetics and heart rate in a nasal congestion canine model.Respiratory research · 2020Article
- Improving adrenaline autoinjector adherence: A psychologically informed training for healthcare professionals.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2019Article
- Underuse of epinephrine for the treatment of anaphylaxis: missed opportunities.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2018Review
- Hymenoptera sting reactions in southern Italy forestry workers: our experience compared to reported data.Clinical and molecular allergy : CMA · 2018Article
- New trends in anaphylaxis.Allergo journal international · 2017Review
- Hymenoptera Allergy and Mast Cell Activation Syndromes.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2016Review
- How incorrect is the use of adrenaline auto-injectors?Internal and emergency medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-administered adrenaline through an auto-injector is the main out-of-hospital treatment for anaphylaxis, and patients should be trained to promptly and correctly use the device. The aim of the study was to verify the proper use of the device and the correct drug administration, and to identify possible misuse by patients. In seven Italian Allergy clinics, patients who were previously provided with self-injectable adrenaline were recruited at the follow-up visit required for the renewal of their prescription. All patients completed a questionnaire covering details of their allergic reactions, and knowledge of the device. The correct use was verified by the physician using a trainer with a four-step examination. 242 patients were included; 46 patients (18 %) did not always carry the auto-injector, and 35 patients (14 %) reported situations in which they were doubtful about whether to use adrenaline. Only 39 % of patients properly managed the device, while some patients (6 %) failed in all four steps. The majority of patients considered it appropriate to use adrenaline at the onset of respiratory symptoms (56 %). The factor most closely related to proper use of the device was the education of the patient (p = 0.03), while age and the time from first prescription did not affect the ability to properly use the auto-injector. Even though accurate training is conducted, many patients are still unable to properly use the adrenaline auto-injector in case of anaphylaxis. Allergists should review the instructions provided to the patients every time a renewal of the auto-injector is prescribed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.