Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25990073›Full record

ReviewCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2015

Orchestrating an immune response against cancer with engineered immune cells expressing αβTCRs, CARs, and innate immune receptors: an immunological and regulatory challenge.

Moniek A de Witte, Guido J J Kierkels, Trudy Straetemans, Cedrik M Britten, Jürgen Kuball

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Strategies to genetically engineer T cells for cancer immunotherapy.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Winning New Combination? Toward Clinical Application in Oncology.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Moniek A de WitteDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room Number Q05.4.301, PO Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Guido J J Kierkels
Trudy Straetemans
Cedrik M Britten
Jürgen Kuball
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NLJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

Worldwide Cancer Research 15-0049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over half a century ago, the first allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) initiated cellular immunotherapy. For several decades, little progress was made, and toxicity of allo-SCT remained a major challenge. However, recent breakthroughs have opened new avenues to further develop this modality and to provide less toxic and equally efficient interventions for patients suffering from hematological or solid malignancies. Current novel cellular immune interventions include ex vivo expansion and adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating immune cells or administration of drugs which antagonize tolerizing mechanisms. Alternatively, transfer of immune cells engineered to express defined T cell receptors (TCRs) and chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) has shown its potential. A valuable addition to 'engineered' adaptive immunity has emerged recently through the improved understanding of how innate immune cells can attack cancer cells without substantial side effects. This has enabled the development of transplantation platforms with limited side effects allowing early immune interventions as well as the design of engineered immune cells expressing innate immune receptors. Here, we focus on innate immune interventions and their orchestration with TCR- and CAR-engineered immune cells. In addition, we discuss how the exploitation of the full potential of cellular immune interventions is influenced by regulatory frameworks. Finally, we highlight and discuss substantial differences in the current landscape of clinical trials in Europe as compared to the USA. The aim is to stimulate international efforts to support regulatory authorities and funding agencies, especially in Europe, to create an environment that will endorse the development of engineered immune cells for the benefit of patients.

Indexed as

Cell EngineeringHumansImmunity, InnateImmunotherapy, AdoptiveKiller Cells, NaturalNeoplasmsReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaReceptors, KIRRecombinant Fusion ProteinsStem Cell TransplantationT-LymphocytesTransplantation, HomologousReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaReceptors, KIRRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25990073
PMCPMC4481298
OpenAlexW251353798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.