Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25990045›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2016

A mixed-methods exploration of implementation of a comprehensive school healthy eating model one year after scale-up.

Patti-Jean Naylor, Heather A McKay, Maria Valente, Louise C Mâsse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Measuring implementation fidelity of school-based obesity prevention programmes: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patti-Jean Naylor1School of Exercise Science,Physical and Health Education,University of Victoria,Box 3015,STN CSC,Victoria,BC V8W 3P1,Canada.
Heather A McKay2Department of Family Practice and Department of Orthopedics,Centre for Hip Health and Mobility,University of British Columbia,Vancouver,British Columbia,Canada.
Maria Valente3Department of Pediatrics and School of Population and Public Health,Centre for Community Child Health Research,University of British Columbia,Vancouver,British Columbia,Canada.
Louise C Mâsse3Department of Pediatrics and School of Population and Public Health,Centre for Community Child Health Research,University of British Columbia,Vancouver,British Columbia,Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research GIR-86122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study the implementation of a school-based healthy eating (HE) model one year after scale-up in British Columbia (BC). Specifically, to examine implementation of Action Schools! BC (AS! BC) and its influence on implementation of classroom HE activities, and to explore factors associated with implementation.

designDiffusion of Innovations, Social Cognitive and Organizational Change theories guided our approach. We used a mixed-methods research design including focus group interviews (seven schools, sixty-two implementers) and a cross-sectional multistage survey to principals (n 36, 92 % response rate) and teachers of grades 4 to 7 (n 168, 70 % response rate). Self-reported implementation of classroom HE activities and reported use of specific AS! BC HE activities were primary implementation measures. Thematic analysis of focus group data and multilevel mixed-effect logistic regression analyses of survey data were conducted.

settingElementary schools across BC, Canada. SUBJECTS: Thirty-nine school districts, thirty-six principals, 168 grade 4 to 7 teachers.

resultsForty-two per cent of teachers in registered schools were implementing AS! BC HE in their classrooms. Users were 6·25 times more likely to have delivered a HE lesson in the past week. Implementation facilitators were school champions, technical support and access to resources; barriers were lack of time, loss of leadership or momentum. Implementation predictors were teacher training, self-efficacy, experience with the physical activity component of AS! BC, supportive school climate and parental post-secondary education.

conclusionsOur findings reinforce that continued teacher training and support are important public health investments that contribute to successful implementation of school-based HE models after scale-up.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthySchoolsAdolescentBritish ColumbiaChildCross-Sectional StudiesEvaluation Studies as TopicExerciseFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalPilot ProjectsHealthy eatingImplementationScale-upSchool-based

Identifiers

PMID25990045
PMCPMC10271143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.