Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25990024›Full record

ArticlePhilosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM2015

The 2014 Varsity Medical Ethics Debate: should we allow genetic information to be patented?

Kiloran H M Metcalfe, Calum A Worsley, Casey B Swerner, Devan Sinha, Ravi Solanki, Krithi Ravi, Raj S Dattani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kiloran H M MetcalfeSt. Hilda's College, University of Oxford, Cowley Place, Oxford, OX4 1DY, UK. kiloran.metcalfe@st-hildas.ox.ac.uk.
Calum A WorsleyEmmanuel College, University of Cambridge, Saint Andrew's Street, Cambridge, CB2 3AP, UK. cw531@cam.ac.uk.
Casey B SwernerSt. John's College, University of Cambridge, St. John's Street, Cambridge, CB21TP, UK. caseyswerner@gmail.com.
Devan SinhaBrasenose College, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Square, Oxford, OX14AJ, UK. devan.sinha@bnc.ox.ac.uk.
Ravi SolankiTrinity College, University of Cambridge, Trinity Street, Cambridge, CB21TQ, UK. rs702@cam.ac.uk.
Krithi RaviSt. Anne's College, University of Oxford, 56 Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6HS, UK. krithi.ravi@st-annes.ox.ac.uk.
Raj S DattaniSt Peter's College, University of Oxford, New Inn Hall Street, Oxford, OX1 2DL, UK. rajdattani@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2014 Varsity Medical Ethics debate convened upon the motion: "This house believes that genetic information should not be commoditised". This annual debate between students from the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, now in its sixth year, provided the starting point for arguments on the subject. The present article brings together and extends many of the arguments put forward during the debate. We explore the circumstances under which genetic material should be considered patentable, the possible effects of this on the research and development of novel therapeutics, and the need for clear guidelines within this rapidly developing field.The Varsity Medical Debate was first held in 2008 with the aim of allowing students to engage in discussion about ethics and policy within healthcare. Two Oxford medical students, Mahiben Maruthappu and Sanjay Budheo founded the event. The event is held annually and it is hoped that this will allow future leaders to voice a perspective on the arguments behind topics that will feature heavily in future healthcare and science policy. This year the Oxford University Medical Society at the Oxford Union hosted the debate.

Indexed as

Dissent and DisputesEthics, MedicalGenetic PrivacyHumansPatents as Topic

Identifiers

PMID25990024
PMCPMC4465727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.