ArticleFertility and sterility2015
Effect of menses on standardized assessment of sexual dysfunction among women with uterine fibroids: a cohort study.
Article in Fertility and sterility, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00995878 (The FIRSTT Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The FIRSTT Study: Comparing Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization for Uterine Fibroids
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using artificial intelligence to predict sexual health outcomes in endometriosis: a decision tree model algorithm.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
- Factors affecting health-related quality of life in women with and without abnormal uterine bleeding: an unmatched case-control study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Uterine Fibroids (Leiomyomata) and Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2022Review
- Analysis of the effect of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy on ovarian function, immune function and quality of sexual life of patients with hysteromyoma at different ages.Oncology letters · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine if assessment of sexual dysfunction by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) is related to whether the FSFI is administered during or between menses, in women with symptomatic uterine fibroids.
designProspective cohort.
settingAcademic medical centers. PATIENT(S): Premenopausal women who had symptomatic uterine fibroids and were enrolled in fibroid treatment trials. INTERVENTION(S): Administration of FSFI during and between menses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Mean FSFI scores in each of 6 domains, and a discordance score to report individual differences in assessment. RESULT(S): Thirty-three women completed the FSFI, during menstruation, and at a time in their cycle when they were not menstruating. The mean FSFI scores for each domain did not differ based on when in the menstrual cycle the instrument was administered. However, on an individual level, nearly half of the women reported sexual dysfunction differently during menses than between menses. Of those that reported differences, the pain and desire domains improved; the lubrication and satisfaction domains worsened during menses. CONCLUSION(S): Although the mean values of the domain scores were not different, women did report differences in sexual functioning during vs. between menses. Timing of the questionnaire in relation to menses should be considered in sexual-dysfunction assessment for women with uterine fibroids. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00995878.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.