Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25989801›Full record

ReviewCancer research and treatment2015

Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Joon Oh Park, Do-Youn Oh, Chiun Hsu, Jen-Shi Chen, Li-Tzong Chen, Mauro Orlando, Jong Seok Kim, Ho Yeong Lim

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer research and treatment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Sex-related disparities in outcomes of survival in biliary tract cancer patients.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. LAG-3xPD-L1 bispecific antibody potentiates antitumor responses of T cells through dendritic cell activation.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Joon Oh ParkDepartment of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Do-Youn OhDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Chiun HsuDepartment of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jen-Shi ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Li-Tzong ChenNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.
Mauro OrlandoEli Lilly Interamerica Inc., Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Jong Seok KimEli Lilly Korea Ltd., Seoul, Korea.
Ho Yeong LimDepartment of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chang Gung University · TWNational Health Research Institutes · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWSamsung Medical Center · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRSungkyunkwan University · KRUniversidad Abierta Interamericana · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence suggests that combined gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy extends survival in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). We conducted a systematic review in order to collate this evidence and assess whether gemcitabine-cisplatin efficacy is influenced by primary tumor site, disease stage, or geographic region, and whether associated toxicities are related to regimen. MEDLINE (1946-search date), EMBASE (1966-search date), ClinicalTrials. gov (2008-search date), and abstracts from major oncology conferences (2009- search date) were searched (5 Dec 2013) using terms for BTC, gemcitabine, and cisplatin. All study types reporting efficacy (survival, response rates) or safety (toxicities) outcomes of gemcitabine-cisplatin in BTC were eligible for inclusion; efficacy data were extracted from prospective studies only. Evidence retrieved from one meta-analysis (abstract), four randomized controlled trials, 12 nonrandomized prospective studies, and three retrospective studies supported the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-cisplatin for BTC. Median overall survival ranged from 4.6 to 11.7 months, and response rate ranged from 17.1% to 36.6%. Toxicities were generally acceptable and manageable. Heterogeneity in study designs and data collected prevented formal meta-analysis, however exploratory assessments suggested that efficacy did not vary with primary tumor site (gallbladder vs. others), disease stage (metastatic vs. locally advanced), or geographic origin (Asia vs. other). Incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities was not related to gemcitabine dose or cisplatin frequency. Despite individual variation in study designs, the evidence presented suggests that gemcitabine-cisplatin is effective in patients from a diverse range of countries and with heterogeneous disease characteristics. No substantial differences in toxicity were observed among the different dosing schedules of gemcitabine and cisplatin.

Indexed as

Biliary tract neoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaCisplatinGallbladder neoplasmsGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID25989801
PMCPMC4509359
OpenAlexW344510317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.