Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25989609›Full record

ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2015

Medically Significant Infections Are Increased in Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Treated With Etanercept: Results From the British Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology Etanercept Cohort Study.

Rebecca Davies, Taunton R Southwood, Lianne Kearsley-Fleet, Mark Lunt, Kimme L Hyrich, British Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology Etanercept Cohort Study

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. How Safe Are Biological Agents in Pediatric Rheumatology?Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca DaviesUniversity of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Taunton R SouthwoodUniversity of Birmingham and Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Lianne Kearsley-FleetUniversity of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Mark LuntUniversity of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Kimme L HyrichUniversity of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, and Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
British Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology Etanercept Cohort Study
University of Manchester · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 20747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe association between anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy and increased rates of infection is widely documented in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Findings in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have been less well documented. The aims of this analysis were to compare the rates of medically significant infections (MSIs) in children with JIA treated with etanercept (ETN) versus methotrexate (MTX) and to compare the rates between combination therapy with ETN plus MTX and monotherapy with ETN.

methodsA total of 852 ETN-treated children and 260 MTX-treated children had been recruited to the British Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology Etanercept Cohort Study (BSPAR-ETN). MSIs included infections that resulted in death or hospitalization or were deemed medically significant by the clinician. This on-drug analysis followed the patients until the first MSI, treatment discontinuation, the last followup, or death. Cox proportional hazards models, which were adjusted using propensity deciles, were used to compare rates of MSI between cohorts. Sensitivity analyses were conducted specifically with regard to serious infections (SIs), which were defined as those requiring hospitalization or treatment with intravenous antibiotics/antivirals.

resultsThe ETN-treated cohort was older and had a longer disease duration, but the disease activity was similar between the cohorts. A total of 133 first MSIs were reported (109 with ETN and 24 with MTX). Patients receiving ETN had higher rates of MSI than did the controls (propensity decile adjusted hazard ratio 2.13 [95% confidence interval 1.22-3.74]). The risk of MSI was higher whether patients were receiving combination or monotherapy. Sensitivity analysis showed no between-group difference in the rate of SIs, which were much less common.

conclusionETN therapy is associated with an increased risk of MSI; however, this increased risk disappears when considering only SIs, which suggests that either there were differences in the severity of infections and/or there was a possible reporting bias.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntirheumatic AgentsAntiviral AgentsArthritis, JuvenileBacterial InfectionsCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesEtanerceptFemaleHospitalizationHumansImmunoglobulin GAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntirheumatic AgentsAntiviral AgentsEtanerceptImmunoglobulin GMethotrexateReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor

Identifiers

PMID25989609
PMCPMC5049649
OpenAlexW1882476550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.