Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25989449›Full record

ReviewVaccine2015

The dengue vaccine pipeline: Implications for the future of dengue control.

Lauren M Schwartz, M Elizabeth Halloran, Anna P Durbin, Ira M Longini

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
27.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Dengue: A Minireview.Viruses · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Designing effective control of dengue with combined interventions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Point of care testing for infectious diseases.Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren M SchwartzDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: laurenms@uw.edu.
M Elizabeth HalloranDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Center for Inference and Dynamics of Infectious Diseases, Seattle, WA, USA.
Anna P DurbinDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ira M LonginiCenter for Inference and Dynamics of Infectious Diseases, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
University of Washington · USFlorida College · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Understanding Transmission with Integrated Genetic and Epidemiologic InferenceU54GM111274 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BEDFORD, TREVOR BC · 2014 to 2018
$12.5M
Methods for Evaluating Vaccine EfficacyR37AI032042 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HALLORAN, M ELIZABETH · 2010 to 2019
$5.1M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200900010CNIAID NIH HHS R37 AI032042NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM 111274NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM111274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue has become the most rapidly expanding mosquito-borne infectious disease on the planet, surpassing malaria and infecting at least 390 million people per year. There is no effective treatment for dengue illness other than supportive care, especially for severe cases. Symptoms can be mild or life-threatening as in dengue hemorrhagic fever and dengue shock syndrome. Vector control has been only partially successful in decreasing dengue transmission. The potential use of safe and effective tetravalent dengue vaccines is an attractive addition to prevent disease or minimize the possibility of epidemics. There are currently no licensed dengue vaccines. This review summarizes the current status of all dengue vaccine candidates in clinical evaluation. Currently five candidate vaccines are in human clinical trials. One has completed two Phase III trials, two are in Phase II trials, and three are in Phase I testing.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDengueDengue VaccinesDrug DiscoveryHumansDengue VaccinesClinical trialDengue vaccineDengue virusEfficacyVaccine

Identifiers

PMID25989449
PMCPMC4470297
OpenAlexW286792534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.