Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25989242›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2015

The cortical computations underlying feedback control in vocal production.

John F Houde, Edward F Chang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Speech motor control is not sequestered from general auditory processes.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effective neural connectivity deficits during speech auditory feedback processing in post-stroke aphasia: An fMRI study.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Article
  13. Vocal Error Monitoring in the Primate Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  14. A corollary discharge circuit in human speech.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Spatiotemporal Mapping of Auditory Onsets during Speech Production.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John F HoudeDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, United States. Electronic address: houde@phy.ucsf.edu.
Edward F ChangDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, United States. Electronic address: edward.chang@ucsf.edu.

Funding

Neuroimaging of Speech Motor ControlR01DC010145 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOUDE, JOHN FRANCIS · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
Imaging sensorimotor adaptation and compensation of speechR01DC013979 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOUDE, JOHN FRANCIS, NAGARAJAN, SRIKANTAN S. · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Timing of Neural activity in Spasmodic DysphoniaR21DC014525 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COUREY, MARK S., HOUDE, JOHN FRANCIS · 2015 to 2016
$436k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010145NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013979NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC014525NIH HHS DP2OD00862PHS HHS R01RDC010145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent neurophysiological studies of speaking are beginning to elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback processing during vocalizations. Here we review how research findings impact our state feedback control (SFC) model of speech motor control. We will discuss the evidence for cortical computations that compare incoming feedback with predictions derived from motor efference copy. We will also review observations from auditory feedback perturbation studies that demonstrate clear evidence for a state estimate correction process, which drives compensatory motor behavioral responses. While there is compelling support for cortical computations in the SFC model, there are still several outstanding questions that await resolution by future neural investigations.

Indexed as

CommunicationAnimalsAuditory PathwaysCerebral CortexFeedback, SensoryHumansVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID25989242
PMCPMC4628828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.