ReviewThe Analyst2015
Conductivity-based detection techniques in nanofluidic devices.
Review in The Analyst, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements of Nanotechnology and Nanomaterials in Environmental and Human Protection for Combatting the COVID-19 During and Post-pandemic Era: A Comprehensive Scientific Review.Biomedical materials & devices (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Review
- Chemically tailoring nanopores for single-molecule sensing and glycomics.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Controlling DNA Translocation Through Solid-state Nanopores.Nanoscale research letters · 2020Review
- Competition between Normative and Drug-Induced Virus Self-Assembly Observed with Single-Particle Methods.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2019Article
- Analytical Techniques to Characterize the Structure, Properties, and Assembly of Virus Capsids.Analytical chemistry · 2019Review
- Solid-state nanopore hydrodynamics and transport.Biomicrofluidics · 2019Article
- Characterization of Virus Capsids and Their Assembly Intermediates by Multicycle Resistive-Pulse Sensing with Four Pores in Series.Analytical chemistry · 2018Article
- Lab-on-a-chip electrical multiplexing techniques for cellular and molecular biomarker detection.Biomicrofluidics · 2018Review
- Quantification of Virus Particles Using Nanopore-Based Resistive-Pulse Sensing Techniques.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review covers conductivity detection in fabricated nanochannels and nanopores. Improvements in nanoscale sensing are a direct result of advances in fabrication techniques, which produce devices with channels and pores with reproducible dimensions and in a variety of materials. Analytes of interest are detected by measuring changes in conductance as the analyte accumulates in the channel or passes transiently through the pore. These detection methods take advantage of phenomena enhanced at the nanoscale, such as ion current rectification, surface conductance, and dimensions comparable to the analytes of interest. The end result is the development of sensing technologies for a broad range of analytes, e.g., ions, small molecules, proteins, nucleic acids, and particles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.