Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25988165›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2014

Biological response of cancer cells to radiation treatment.

Rajamanickam Baskar, Jiawen Dai, Nei Wenlong, Richard Yeo, Kheng-Wei Yeoh

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 310 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
310citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

310 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 633 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Head-to-head comparison of [EJNMMI research · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

250 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rajamanickam BaskarDivision of Cellular and Molecular Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Jiawen DaiDivision of Cellular and Molecular Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Nei WenlongDivision of Cellular and Molecular Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Richard YeoDivision of Cellular and Molecular Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Kheng-Wei YeohDivision of Cellular and Molecular Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
National Cancer Centre Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a class of diseases characterized by uncontrolled cell growth and has the ability to spread or metastasize throughout the body. In recent years, remarkable progress has been made toward the understanding of proposed hallmarks of cancer development, care, and treatment modalities. Radiation therapy or radiotherapy is an important and integral component of cancer management, mostly conferring a survival benefit. Radiation therapy destroys cancer by depositing high-energy radiation on the cancer tissues. Over the years, radiation therapy has been driven by constant technological advances and approximately 50% of all patients with localized malignant tumors are treated with radiation at some point in the course of their disease. In radiation oncology, research and development in the last three decades has led to considerable improvement in our understanding of the differential responses of normal and cancer cells. The biological effectiveness of radiation depends on the linear energy transfer (LET), total dose, number of fractions and radiosensitivity of the targeted cells or tissues. Radiation can either directly or indirectly (by producing free radicals) damages the genome of the cell. This has been challenged in recent years by a newly identified phenomenon known as radiation induced bystander effect (RIBE). In RIBE, the non-irradiated cells adjacent to or located far from the irradiated cells/tissues demonstrate similar responses to that of the directly irradiated cells. Understanding the cancer cell responses during the fractions or after the course of irradiation will lead to improvements in therapeutic efficacy and potentially, benefitting a significant proportion of cancer patients. In this review, the clinical implications of radiation induced direct and bystander effects on the cancer cell are discussed.

Indexed as

bystander effectcancer cellsdirect DNA damageradiation

Identifiers

PMID25988165
PMCPMC4429645
OpenAlexW2092723840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.