Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25987897›Full record

ReviewEcancermedicalscience2015

Performance of HPV DNA testing in the follow-up after treatment of high-grade cervical lesions, adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and microinvasive carcinoma.

Silvano Costa, Simona Venturoli, Massimo Origoni, Mario Preti, Luciano Mariani, Paolo Cristoforoni, Maria Teresa Sandri

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecancermedicalscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Analysis of Conization Results in Patients undergoing Hysterectomy for Uterine Adenocarcinoma.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Silvano CostaObstetrics & Gynaecology Unit, Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy Present address: MF Toniolo Hospital, via Toscana, 42, Bologna 40138, Italy ; The Italian HPV Study Group (IHSG).
Simona VenturoliUnit of Microbiology, Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Prevention, S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna 40138, Italy.
Massimo OrigoniDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano 20132, Italy ; The Italian HPV Study Group (IHSG).
Mario PretiPreventive Gynaecology Unit, European Institute of Oncology, Milano 20141, Italy ; The Italian HPV Study Group (IHSG).
Luciano MarianiHPV Unit, Gynaecologic Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute of Rome, Rome 00144, Italy ; The Italian HPV Study Group (IHSG).
Paolo CristoforoniNational Institute on Cancer Research (IST), Genova 16132, Italy ; The Italian HPV Study Group (IHSG).
Maria Teresa SandriPreventive Gynaecology Unit, European Institute of Oncology, Milano 20141, Italy ; The Italian HPV Study Group (IHSG).
IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the last two decades it has become clear that distinct types of human papillomavirus (HPV), the so-called high-risk types (hrHPV), are the major cause of cervical cancer. The hrHPV-DNA testing has shown excellent performance in several clinical applications from screening to the follow-up of conservatively treated patients.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of the recent literature on the performance of HPV DNA testing in follow-up after treatment of high-grade cervical lesions, adenocarcinoma in situ, and microinvasive carcinoma compared to Pap smear cytology.

resultsObservational studies have demonstrated that the high risk hrHPV-DNA test is significantly more sensitive (95%) compared to follow-up cytology(70%) in detecting post-treatment squamous intraepithelial high-grade lesions. Moreover, in patients treated conservatively for cervical adenocarcinoma in situ, the hrHPV-DNA test is the most significant independent predictor of recurrent disease or progression to invasive cancer, and the combination of viral DNA testing and cytology reaches 90% sensitivity in detecting persistent lesions at the first follow-up visit and 100% at the second follow-up visit. The cause of microinvasive squamous cervical carcinoma is increasingly treated with conservative therapies in order to preserve fertility, and an effective strategy allowing early detection of residual or progressive disease has become more and more important in post-treatment follow-up. Primary results seem to indicate that the median time for viral clearance is relatively longer compared with patients treated for CIN and suggest a prolonged surveillance for these patients. However, the potential clinical value of HPV-DNA testing in this clinical setting needs to be confirmed by further observations.

conclusionsThe excellent sensitivity, negative predictive value, and optimal reproducibility of the hrHPV DNA testing, currently is considered a powerful tool in the clinicians' hands to better manage post-treatment follow-up either in cervical squamous lesion or in situ adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

adenocarcinioma in situCIN2+ lesionCIN recurrencefollow-upgenotypingHPV-testingmicroinvasive squamous carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID25987897
PMCPMC4431402
OpenAlexW2044236128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.