Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25987891›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2015

A comparison of high-throughput techniques for assaying circadian rhythms in plants.

Andrew J Tindall, Jade Waller, Mark Greenwood, Peter D Gould, James Hartwell, Anthony Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew J TindallInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, UK.
Jade WallerInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, UK.
Mark GreenwoodInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, UK.
Peter D GouldInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, UK.
James HartwellInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, UK.
Anthony HallInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F009313/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last two decades, the development of high-throughput techniques has enabled us to probe the plant circadian clock, a key coordinator of vital biological processes, in ways previously impossible. With the circadian clock increasingly implicated in key fitness and signalling pathways, this has opened up new avenues for understanding plant development and signalling. Our tool-kit has been constantly improving through continual development and novel techniques that increase throughput, reduce costs and allow higher resolution on the cellular and subcellular levels. With circadian assays becoming more accessible and relevant than ever to researchers, in this paper we offer a review of the techniques currently available before considering the horizons in circadian investigation at ever higher throughputs and resolutions.

Indexed as

Circadian clockDelayed fluorescenceHigh-throughput assayInfra-red gas exchangeLeaf movementLuciferase

Identifiers

PMID25987891
PMCPMC4435651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.