ReviewDialogues in clinical neuroscience2015
The history of nosology and the rise of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
Review in Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry: Five Decades of Progress and Persistent Translational Challenges.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2026Article
- It's Not Really the Words; It's How They Land: Lived Experience Perspectives on the Use of Language and Labels in Mental Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- How to improve psychiatric nosography in the XXI century: a phenomenologist"s viewpoint.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025Article
- Case Report: The intersection of psychiatry and medicine: diagnostic and ethical insights from case studies.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Diagnosing the context is as important as diagnosing the individual.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- "What is in a name?"-Definition of mental disorder in the last 50 years: a scoping review, according to the perspective of clinical psychology.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
- Film, observation and the mind.History of the human sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Brain insulin signaling and cognition: Possible links.EXCLI journal · 2023Review
- Review
- The Power of Images and the Logics of Discovery in Psychiatric Care.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Psychiatric diagnosis and treatment in the 21st century: paradigm shifts versus incremental integration.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2022Article
- Klerman's "credo" reconsidered: neo-Kraepelinianism, Spitzer's views, and what we can learn from the past.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2022Article
- The scientific integrity of ADHD: A critical examination of the underpinning theoretical constructs.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Review
- Associations between Autoimmunity and Depression: Serum IL-6 and IL-17 Have Directly Impact on the HAMD Scores in Patients with First-Episode Depressive Disorder.Journal of immunology research · 2022Article
- A New Paradigm to Indicate Antidepressant Treatments.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Roles of Nitric Oxide Synthase/Nitric Oxide Pathway in the Pathology of Vascular Dementia and Related Therapeutic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- [Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults in the clinical description and classification of Emil Kraepelin].Der Nervenarzt · 2020Review
- Fractures in the framework: limitations of classification systems in psychiatry .Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2020Review
- Rat animal models for screening medications to treat alcohol use disorders.Neuropharmacology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5 arose from a tradition filled with haphazard science and politically driven choices. The nosology of modern psychiatry began with the German classifiers of the late 19th century, especially Emil Kraepelin. Psychoanalysis then blotted out the classificatory vision for the next half-century, and most of this European psychopathological science failed to cross the Atlantic. The DSM series was a homegrown American product, beginning with Medical 203 in 1945, then guided by psychoanalytic insights through DSM-I in 1952 and DSM-II in 1968. In 1980, DSM-III represented a massive "turning of the page" in nosology, and it had the effect of steering psychoanalysis toward the exit in psychiatry and the beginning of a reconciliation of psychiatry with the rest of medicine. With the advent of DSM-5, however, questions are starting to be asked about whether this massive venture is on the right track.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25987864PMC4421901W2407171739What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.