Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25987700›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2015

Validation and Development of a Modified Breast Graded Prognostic Assessment As a Tool for Survival in Patients With Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases.

Ishwaria M Subbiah, Xiudong Lei, Jeffrey S Weinberg, Erik P Sulman, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Debu Tripathy, Rohan Gupta, Ankur Varma, Jay Chouhan, Richard P Guevarra and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Radiotherapeutic management of brain metastases in patients with breast cancer: a narrative review.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Review
  4. Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology breast cancer expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer brain metastasis (2025).Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ishwaria M SubbiahAll authors: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Xiudong LeiAll authors: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Jeffrey S WeinbergAll authors: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Erik P SulmanAll authors: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Mariana Chavez-MacGregorAll authors: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Debu TripathyAll authors: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. dtripathy@mdanderson.org.
Rohan GuptaAll authors: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Ankur VarmaAll authors: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Jay ChouhanAll authors: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Richard P GuevarraAll authors: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Vicente ValeroAll authors: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Mark R GilbertAll authors: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Ana M Gonzalez-AnguloAll authors: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSeveral indices have been developed to predict overall survival (OS) in patients with breast cancer with brain metastases, including the breast graded prognostic assessment (breast-GPA), comprising age, tumor subtype, and Karnofsky performance score. However, number of brain metastases-a highly relevant clinical variable-is less often incorporated into the final model. We sought to validate the existing breast-GPA in an independent larger cohort and refine it integrating number of brain metastases. PATIENTS AND

methodsData were retrospectively gathered from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases from 1996 to 2013 were identified. After validating the breast-GPA, multivariable Cox regression and recursive partitioning analysis led to the development of the modified breast-GPA. The performances of the breast-GPA and modified breast-GPA were compared using the concordance index.

resultsIn our cohort of 1,552 patients, the breast-GPA was validated as a prognostic tool for OS (P < .001). In multivariable analysis of the breast-GPA and number of brain metastases (> three v ≤ three), both were independent predictors of OS. We therefore developed the modified breast-GPA integrating a fourth clinical parameter. Recursive partitioning analysis reinforced the prognostic significance of these four factors. Concordance indices were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.80) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.85) for the breast-GPA and modified breast-GPA, respectively (P < .001).

conclusionThe modified breast-GPA incorporates four simple clinical parameters of high prognostic significance. This index has an immediate role in the clinic as a formative part of the clinician's discussion of prognosis and direction of care and as a potential patient selection tool for clinical trials.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAge FactorsBrain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsBreast Neoplasms, MaleChi-Square DistributionDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKarnofsky Performance StatusMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm GradingPatient Selection

Identifiers

PMID25987700
PMCPMC5098846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.