Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25987611›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Impact of Ciprofloxacin and Clindamycin Administration on Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolated from Healthy Volunteers and Characterization of the Resistance Genes They Harbor.

Roderick M Card, Muriel Mafura, Theresa Hunt, Miranda Kirchner, Jan Weile, Mamun-Ur Rashid, Andrej Weintraub, Carl Erik Nord, Muna F Anjum

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Oral microbiota may predict the presence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Gut dysbiosis and age-related neurological diseases; an innovative approach for therapeutic interventions.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  5. Characterizing Antimicrobial ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. AnmBio · 2017
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Journal of oral microbiology · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Roderick M CardDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Muriel MafuraDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Theresa HuntDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Miranda KirchnerDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Jan WeileInstitute for Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine at the Heart and Diabetes Centre, University Hospital of the Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany.
Mamun-Ur RashidDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Andrej WeintraubDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carl Erik NordDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Muna F AnjumDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, United Kingdom muna.anjum@apha.gsi.gov.uk.
Animal and Plant Health Agency · GBKarolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SERuhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, and placebo administration on culturable Gram-negative isolates and the antibiotic resistance genes they harbor. Saliva and fecal samples were collected from healthy human volunteers before and at intervals, up to 1 year after antibiotic administration. Samples were plated on selective and nonselective media to monitor changes in different colony types or bacterial species. Following ciprofloxacin administration, there was a decrease of Escherichia coli in feces and after clindamycin administration a decrease of Bacteroides in feces and Leptotrichia in saliva, which all returned to pretreatment levels within 1 to 4 months. Ciprofloxacin administration also resulted in an increase in ciprofloxacin-resistant Veillonella in saliva, which persisted for 12 months. Additionally, 949 aerobic and anaerobic isolates purified from ciprofloxacin- and clindamycin-containing plates were screened for the presence of resistance genes. Resistance gene carriage was widespread in isolates from all three treatment groups, and no association was observed between genes and antibiotic administration. Although the anaerobic component of the microbiota was not a major reservoir of aerobe-associated antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes, we detected the sulfonamide resistance gene sul2 in anaerobic isolates. The longitudinal nature of the study allowed identification of distinct Escherichia coli clones harboring multiple resistance genes, including one carrying an extended-spectrum β-lactamase blaCTX-M group 9 gene, which persisted in the gut for up to 4 months. This study provided insight into the effects of antibiotic administration on healthy microbiota and the diversity of resistance genes harbored therein.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCiprofloxacinClindamycinDrug Resistance, BacterialFecesGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHealthy VolunteersHumansMicrobiotaSalivaAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCiprofloxacinClindamycin

Identifiers

PMID25987611
PMCPMC4505225
OpenAlexW1885147170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.