Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25987540›Full record

ArticleAppetite2015

Alterations in sucrose sham-feeding intake as a function of diet-exposure in rats maintained on calorically dense diets.

Yada Treesukosol, Nu-Chu Liang, Timothy H Moran

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Characterizing ingestive behavior through licking microstructure: Underlying neurobiology and its use in the study of obesity in animal models.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yada TreesukosolDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Ross 615, 720 Rutland Ave, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: yadatree@jhmi.edu.
Nu-Chu LiangDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Ross 615, 720 Rutland Ave, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Timothy H MoranDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Ross 615, 720 Rutland Ave, Baltimore, MD, USA; Johns Hopkins Global Obesity Prevention Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Gastrointestional Integration and FeedingR01DK019302 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MORAN, TIMOTHY H · 1986 to 2019
$7.1M
Gastrointestional Integration and FeedingR56DK019302 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MORAN, TIMOTHY H · 2010 to 2010
$720k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK019302NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK019302NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK019302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously reported that rats increase meal size upon initial presentation of a calorically dense diet. The increase may be attributed to increased orosensory stimulation and/or reduced sensitivity to post-ingestive inhibitory signals. During feeding both types of signals are simultaneously in play; thus here, we compare responses in rats presented a high-energy diet (HE) or 45% high-fat diet (HF) with those of chow-fed controls (CHOW) in a sham-feeding procedure in which post-ingestive feedback is minimized. Measures of sham-feeding to sucrose were taken before diet manipulation (baseline), ~5 days (dynamic phase) and ~6 weeks (static phase) following introduction of the palatable diet, as well as after animals were switched back to standard chow (recovery phase). Some but not all the hypotheses based on our previous findings were confirmed by the outcomes here. Consistent with our hypothesis that enhanced orosensory stimulation during the dynamic phase compared with the static phase would generalize to increased intake of other palatable stimuli, HE rats showed higher sucrose intake during the dynamic phase compared with the static phase. Contrary to what we hypothesized, HE and HF rats did not increase responses to sucrose compared to CHOW rats. In fact, HE rats showed decreased responses compared to CHOW controls. Thus changes in orosensory stimulation do not necessarily generalize to increased intake of other palatable stimuli.

Indexed as

Appetite RegulationDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDietary SucroseDiet, High-FatEnergy IntakeFood PreferencesHyperphagiaMaleObesityRats, Sprague-DawleyWeight GainDietary SucroseHigh fatOralPalatabilityPost-ingestiveSweetTaste

Identifiers

PMID25987540
PMCPMC4499488
OpenAlexW219654219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.