ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2016
In Vivo Detection of miRNA Expression in Tumors Using an Activatable Nanosensor.
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preclinical Imaging Evaluation of miRNAs' Delivery and Effects in Breast Cancer Mouse Models: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2021Review
- Peritumoral Microenvironment in High-Grade Gliomas: From FLAIRectomy to Microglia-Glioma Cross-Talk.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Combining miR-10b-Targeted Nanotherapy with Low-Dose Doxorubicin Elicits Durable Regressions of Metastatic Breast Cancer.Cancer research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe development of tools for the analysis of microRNA (miRNA) function in tumors can advance our diagnostic and prognostic capabilities. Here, we describe the development of technology for the profiling of miRNA expression in the tumors of live animals. PROCEDURES: The approach is based on miRNA nanosensors consisting of sensor oligonucleotides conjugated to magnetic nanoparticles for systemic delivery. Feasibility was demonstrated for the detection of miR-10b, implicated in epithelial to mesenchymal transition and the development of metastasis. The miR-10b nanosensor was tested in vivo in two mouse models of cancer. In the first model, mice were implanted subcutaneously with MDA-MB-231-luc-D3H2LN tumors, in which miR-10b was inhibited. In the second model, mice were implanted bilaterally with metastatic MDA-MB-231 and nonmetastatic MCF-7 cells. The nanosensors were injected intravenously, and fluorescence intensity in the tumors was monitored over time.
resultsWe showed that the described nanosensors are capable of discriminating between tumors based on their expression of miR-10b. Radiant efficiency was higher in the miR-10b-active tumors than in the miR-10b-inhibited tumors and in the MDA-MB-231 tumors relative to the MCF-7 tumors.
conclusionsThe described technology provides an important tool that could be used to answer questions about microRNA function in cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.