Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25986734›Full record

ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2015

The influence of neighborhood socioeconomic status and race on survival from ovarian cancer: a population-based analysis of Cook County, Illinois.

Katherine C Brewer, Caryn E Peterson, Faith G Davis, Kent Hoskins, Heather Pauls, Charlotte E Joslin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. The KPROCS Study: A Real-World and Research Resource to Investigate Multilevel Determinants of Ovarian Cancer Treatment and Survival.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Intersectionality between Race, Ethnicity, and Residential-Level Socioeconomic Status in Disparities of Head and Neck Cancer Outcomes: A SEER Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherine C BrewerDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (MC 923), School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
Caryn E PetersonDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (MC 923), School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago; Cancer Control and Population Science Research Program, University of Illinois at Chicago Cancer Center, Chicago.
Faith G DavisCancer Control and Population Science Research Program, University of Illinois at Chicago Cancer Center, Chicago; Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 3-317 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Alberta, Canada.
Kent HoskinsCancer Control and Population Science Research Program, University of Illinois at Chicago Cancer Center, Chicago; Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
Heather PaulsInstitute for Health Research and Policy (IHRP), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
Charlotte E JoslinDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (MC 923), School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago; Cancer Control and Population Science Research Program, University of Illinois at Chicago Cancer Center, Chicago; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago. Electronic address: charjosl@uic.edu.
University of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Research Training Education CoreP60MD003424 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI DAVIS, FAITH G. · 2009 to 2013
$9.2M
NIMHD NIH HHS 1 P60 MD003424NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD003424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite significant improvements in treatment for ovarian cancer, survival is poorer for non-Hispanic black (NHB) women compared to non-Hispanic white (NHW) women. Neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) has been implicated in racial disparities across a variety of health outcomes and may similarly contribute to racial disparities in ovarian cancer survival. The purpose of this analysis is to assess the influence of neighborhood SES on NHB-NHW survival differences after accounting for differences in tumor characteristics and in treatment.

methodsData were obtained from 2432 women (443 NHB and 1989 NHW) diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer in Cook County, Illinois between 1998 and 2007. Neighborhood (i.e., census tract) SES at the time of diagnosis was calculated for each woman using two well-established composite measures of affluence and disadvantage. Cox proportional hazard models measured the association between NHB race and survival after adjusting for age, tumor characteristics, treatment, year of diagnosis, and neighborhood SES.

resultsThere was a strong association between ovarian cancer survival and both measures of neighborhood SES (P < .0001 for both affluence and disadvantage). After adjusting for age, tumor characteristics, treatment, and year of diagnosis, NHB were more likely than NHW to die of ovarian cancer (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28-1.68). The inclusion of neighborhood affluence and disadvantage into models separately and together attenuated this risk (HRaffluence = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.18-1.58; HRdisadvantage = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.08-1.52; and HRaffluence + disadvantage = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.08-1.52.

conclusionsNeighborhood SES, as measured by composite measures of affluence and disadvantage, is a predictor of survival in women diagnosed with ovarian cancer in Cook County, Illinois and may contribute to the racial disparity in survival.

Indexed as

Residence CharacteristicsSocial ClassAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBlack or African AmericanCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansIllinoisMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsOvariectomyPopulation SurveillanceCancer survivalNeighborhood-level factorsOvarian cancerRacial disparitiesSES

Identifiers

PMID25986734
PMCPMC4494782
OpenAlexW2008681283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.