ArticleGenome biology2015
When will 'open science' become simply 'science'?
Article in Genome biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Natural language processing of symptoms documented in free-text narratives of electronic health records: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Pooled it
- Advocacy and Open Science in the UK: Case Studies in the Autism Wars.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- A how-to guide for code sharing in biology.PLoS biology · 2024Review
- Review of Shoreline Extraction Methods from Aerial Laser Scanning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Integrating open science education into an undergraduate health professional research program.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2022Article
- Making the collective knowledge of chemistry open and machine actionable.Nature chemistry · 2022Review
- Open data and data sharing in articles about COVID-19 published in preprint servers medRxiv and bioRxiv.Scientometrics · 2022Article
- Close to open-Factors that hinder and promote open science in ecology research and education.PloS one · 2022Article
- Health sciences librarians' engagement in open science: a scoping review.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2021Article
- Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Consolidating RRI and Open Science: understanding the potential for transformative change.Life sciences, society and policy · 2020Article
- Open exploration.eLife · 2020Article
- The Challenge of Transparency and Validation in Health Economic Decision Modelling: A View from Mount Hood.PharmacoEconomics · 2019Article
- Article
- Public Funding and Open Access to Research: A Review of Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Review
- Observational
- Being open: our policy on source code.Genome biology · 2016Article
- The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review.F1000Research · 2016Review
- Five selfish reasons to work reproducibly.Genome biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Open science describes the practice of carrying out scientific research in a completely transparent manner, and making the results of that research available to everyone. Isn't that just 'science'?
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.