Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25986572›Full record

Trial reportBMJ quality & safety2015

Exploring demographic and lifestyle associations with patient experience following telephone triage by a primary care doctor or nurse: secondary analyses from a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Fiona C Warren, Raff Calitri, Emily Fletcher, Anna Varley, Tim A Holt, Valerie Lattimer, David Richards, Suzanne Richards, Chris Salisbury, Rod S Taylor and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ quality & safety, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Uses of Virtual Care in Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  6. Access systems in general practice: a systematic scoping review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fiona C WarrenPrimary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Raff CalitriPrimary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Emily FletcherPrimary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Anna VarleySchool of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Tim A HoltDepartment of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Valerie LattimerSchool of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
David RichardsPrimary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Suzanne RichardsPrimary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Chris SalisburyCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Rod S TaylorPrimary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
John L CampbellPrimary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
University of Exeter · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ESTEEM trial was a cluster randomised controlled trial that compared two telephone triage management systems (general practitioner (GP) or a nurse supported by computer decision support software) with usual care, in response to a request for same-day consultation in general practice.

aimTo investigate associations between trial patients' demographic, health, and lifestyle characteristics, and their reported experiences of care.

settingRecruitment of 20 990 patients occurred between May 2011 and December 2012 in 42 GP practices in England (13 GP triage, 15 nurse triage, 14 usual care).

methodPatients reported their experiences via a postal questionnaire issued 4 weeks after their initial request for a same-day consultation. Overall satisfaction, ease of accessing medical help/advice, and convenience of care were analysed using linear hierarchical modelling.

resultsQuestionnaires were returned by 12 132 patients (58%). Older patients reported increased overall satisfaction compared with patients aged 25-59 years, but patients aged 16-24 years reported lower satisfaction. Compared with white patients, patients from ethnic minorities reported lower satisfaction in all three arms, although to a lesser degree in the GP triage arm. Patients from ethnic minorities reported higher satisfaction in the GP triage than in usual care, whereas white patients reported higher satisfaction with usual care. Patients unable to take time away from work or who could only do so with difficulty reported lower satisfaction across all three trial arms.

conclusionsPatient characteristics, such as age, ethnicity and ability to attend their practice during work hours, were associated with their experiences of care following a same-day consultation request in general practice. Telephone triage did not increase satisfaction among patients who were unable to attend their practice during working hours. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISCRTN20687662.

Indexed as

General PractitionersLife StylePrimary Care NursingTelephoneTriageAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesGeneral practicePatient satisfactionPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID25986572
PMCPMC4552919
OpenAlexW2158574076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.