Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25986506›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2015

Spinal muscular atrophy--recent therapeutic advances for an old challenge.

Irene Faravelli, Monica Nizzardo, Giacomo P Comi, Stefania Corti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in genetics · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Irene FaravelliDino Ferrari Centre, Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Neurology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Monica NizzardoDino Ferrari Centre, Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Neurology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Giacomo P ComiDino Ferrari Centre, Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Neurology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Stefania CortiDino Ferrari Centre, Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Neurology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy.

Funding

Telethon GGP14025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decade, improved understanding of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) aetiopathogenesis has brought us to a historical turning point: we are at the verge of development of disease-modifying treatments for this hitherto incurable disease. The increasingly precise delineation of molecular targets within the survival of motor neuron (SMN) gene locus has led to the development of promising therapeutic strategies. These novel avenues in treatment for SMA include gene therapy, molecular therapy with antisense oligonucleotides, and small molecules that aim to increase expression of SMN protein. Stem cell studies of SMA have provided an in vitro model for SMA, and stem cell transplantation could be used as a complementary strategy with a potential to treat the symptomatic phases of the disease. Here, we provide an overview of established data and novel insights into SMA pathogenesis, including discussion of the crucial function of the SMN protein. Preclinical evidence and recent advances from ongoing clinical trials are thoroughly reviewed. The final remarks are dedicated to future clinical perspectives in this rapidly evolving field, with a broad discussion on the comparison between the outlined therapeutic approaches and the remaining open questions.

Indexed as

AnimalsClinical Trials as TopicDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMotor NeuronsMuscular Atrophy, SpinalOligonucleotides, AntisenseSMN Complex ProteinsOligonucleotides, AntisenseSMN Complex Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.