Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25986137›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2015

The Effectiveness of a Physician-Only and Physician-Patient Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions Between Providers and African American and Latino Patients.

Nancy C Dolan, Vanessa Ramirez-Zohfeld, Alfred W Rademaker, M Rosario Ferreira, William L Galanter, Jonathan Radosta, Milton Mickey Eder, Kenzie A Cameron

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Health Literacy Interventions in Cancer: a Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Factors Influencing Adherence to Recommended Colorectal Cancer Surveillance: Experiences and Behaviors of Colorectal Cancer Survivors.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nancy C DolanDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 675 N. St. Clair St. Suite 18-200, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. ndolan@nmff.org.
Vanessa Ramirez-ZohfeldDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 675 N. St. Clair St. Suite 18-200, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Alfred W RademakerDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
M Rosario FerreiraDivision of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
William L GalanterDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jonathan RadostaDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA.
Milton Mickey EderDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kenzie A CameronDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 675 N. St. Clair St. Suite 18-200, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

Funding

Tumor Environment and Metastasis (TEAM) Research ProgramP30CA060553 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Daniela E Matei · 1993 to 2026
$153.9M
Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Low-literacy Physician-Patient Intervention Promoting Colorectal Cancer ScreeningR01CA140177 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CAMERON, KENZIE A · 2009 to 2012
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NCI NIH HHS P30 CA060553NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysician recommendation of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is a critical facilitator of screening completion. Providing patients a choice of screening options may increase CRC screening completion, particularly among racial and ethnic minorities.

objectiveOur purpose was to assess the effectiveness of physician-only and physician-patient interventions on increasing rates of CRC screening discussions as compared to usual care.

designThis study was quasi-experimental. Clinics were allocated to intervention or usual care; patients in intervention clinics were randomized to receipt of patient intervention.

participantsPatients aged 50 to 75 years, due for CRC screening, receiving care at either a federally qualified health care center or an academic health center participated in the study.

interventionIntervention physicians received continuous quality improvement and communication skills training. Intervention patients watched an educational video immediately before their appointment. MAIN MEASURES: Rates of patient-reported 1) CRC screening discussions, and 2) discussions of more than one screening test. KEY

resultsThe physician-patient intervention (n = 167) resulted in higher rates of CRC screening discussions compared to both physician-only intervention (n = 183; 61.1 % vs.50.3 %, p = 0.008) and usual care (n = 153; 61.1 % vs. 34.0 % p = 0.03). More discussions of specific CRC screening tests and discussions of more than one test occurred in the intervention arms than in usual care (44.6 % vs. 22.9 %,p = 0.03) and (5.1 % vs. 2.0 %, p = 0.036), respectively, but discussion of more than one test was uncommon. Across all arms, 143 patients (28.4 %) reported discussion of colonoscopy only; 21 (4.2 %) reported discussion of both colonoscopy and stool tests.

conclusionsCompared to usual care and a physician-only intervention, a physician-patient intervention increased rates of CRC screening discussions, yet discussions overwhelmingly focused solely on colonoscopy. In underserved patient populations where access to colonoscopy may be limited, interventions encouraging discussions of both stool tests and colonoscopy may be needed.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAgedBlack or African AmericanColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsCommunicationEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHispanic or LatinoHumansIllinoisMaleMiddle AgedOccult BloodPatient Education as Topiccolorectal cancer screeninghealth literacyphysician communication of preventive carerandomized trial

Identifiers

PMID25986137
PMCPMC4636583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.