ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2015
[Recognition of infections in elderly emergency patients].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in urgency levels and risk of acute critical condition among prehospital patients. A seven-year observational historic register-based cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Calculated parenteral initial therapy of bacterial infections: Antibiotic treatment in the elderly.GMS infectious diseases · 2020Article
- 2017 WSES guidelines for the management of iatrogenic colonoscopy perforation.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElderly patients represent an increasing population in the emergency department (ED) and physicians often have to deal with multimorbidity and complexity. Infections are one of the major reasons for ED presentations of older patients and the main cause of mortality; however, infections are often difficult to diagnose in older patients.
aimThis article provides a review of important indicators for infections, diagnostic tools and limitations in elderly patients. MATERIAL AND
methodsA literature search was carried out using PubMed in the period 1990-2015 and in addition own published data are presented. RESULTS AND
conclusionInfections in the elderly are difficult to assess in the emergency department due to atypical symptoms. Even subtle changes need to be recognized. For the diagnosis of infections in older ED patients unspecific symptoms, vital parameters, laboratory parameters, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin levels, cognitive function and functionality of the patient need to be taken into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.