ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2015
A new approach to develop computer-aided detection schemes of digital mammograms.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reproducibility and Explainability of Deep Learning in Mammography: A Systematic Review of Literature.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2024Review
- A multi-stage fusion framework to classify breast lesions using deep learning and radiomics features computed from four-view mammograms.Medical physics · 2023Article
- A Review of Machine Learning Techniques for the Classification and Detection of Breast Cancer from Medical Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Improving Performance of Breast Lesion Classification Using a ResNet50 Model Optimized with a Novel Attention Mechanism.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Article
- Improving mammography lesion classification by optimal fusion of handcrafted and deep transfer learning features.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Applying artificial intelligence technology to assist with breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- A Bottom-Up Review of Image Analysis Methods for Suspicious Region Detection in Mammograms.Journal of imaging · 2021Review
- Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms: a quantitative assessment.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2021Article
- Development and Assessment of a New Global Mammographic Image Feature Analysis Scheme to Predict Likelihood of Malignant Cases.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2020Article
- Deep learning modeling using normal mammograms for predicting breast cancer risk.Medical physics · 2020Article
- Applying a new computer-aided detection scheme generated imaging marker to predict short-term breast cancer risk.Physics in medicine and biology · 2018Article
- Applying a new bilateral mammographic density segmentation method to improve accuracy of breast cancer risk prediction.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2017Article
- Developing a new case based computer-aided detection scheme and an adaptive cueing method to improve performance in detecting mammographic lesions.Physics in medicine and biology · 2017Article
- Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2016Review
- Computer-aided breast MR image feature analysis for prediction of tumor response to chemotherapy.Medical physics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop a new global mammographic image feature analysis based computer-aided detection (CAD) scheme and evaluate its performance in detecting positive screening mammography examinations. A dataset that includes images acquired from 1896 full-field digital mammography (FFDM) screening examinations was used in this study. Among them, 812 cases were positive for cancer and 1084 were negative or benign. After segmenting the breast area, a computerized scheme was applied to compute 92 global mammographic tissue density based features on each of four mammograms of the craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views. After adding three existing popular risk factors (woman's age, subjectively rated mammographic density, and family breast cancer history) into the initial feature pool, we applied a sequential forward floating selection feature selection algorithm to select relevant features from the bilateral CC and MLO view images separately. The selected CC and MLO view image features were used to train two artificial neural networks (ANNs). The results were then fused by a third ANN to build a two-stage classifier to predict the likelihood of the FFDM screening examination being positive. CAD performance was tested using a ten-fold cross-validation method. The computed area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was AUC = 0.779 ± 0.025 and the odds ratio monotonically increased from 1 to 31.55 as CAD-generated detection scores increased. The study demonstrated that this new global image feature based CAD scheme had a relatively higher discriminatory power to cue the FFDM examinations with high risk of being positive, which may provide a new CAD-cueing method to assist radiologists in reading and interpreting screening mammograms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.