Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25984605›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2015

Optimization of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: insights gained from clinically-derived computer models.

Jichao Zhao, Sanjay R Kharche, Brian J Hansen, Thomas A Csepe, Yufeng Wang, Martin K Stiles, Vadim V Fedorov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. VirtualFrontiers in physiology · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jichao ZhaoAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. j.zhao@auckland.ac.nz.
Sanjay R KharcheCollege of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK. S.R.Kharche@exeter.ac.uk.
Brian J HansenDepartment of Physiology & Cell Biology and Davis Heart & Lung Research Institute, the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. hansen.296@buckeyemail.osu.edu.
Thomas A CsepeDepartment of Physiology & Cell Biology and Davis Heart & Lung Research Institute, the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. csepe.2@buckeyemail.osu.edu.
Yufeng WangAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. ywan520@aucklanduni.ac.nz.
Martin K StilesDepartment of Cardiology, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand. Martin.Stiles@waikatodhb.health.nz.
Vadim V FedorovDepartment of Physiology & Cell Biology and Davis Heart & Lung Research Institute, the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. vadim.fedorov@osumc.edu.

Funding

Integration of structure and signaling in cardiac pacemaker functionR01HL115580 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FEDOROV, VADIM V · 2013 to 2021
$4.2M
British Heart FoundationNHLBI NIH HHS HL115580NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL115580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disturbance, and its treatment is an increasing economic burden on the health care system. Despite recent intense clinical, experimental and basic research activity, the treatment of AF with current antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter/surgical therapies remains limited. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is widely used to treat patients with AF. Current clinical ablation strategies are largely based on atrial anatomy and/or substrate detected using different approaches, and they vary from one clinical center to another. The nature of clinical ablation leads to ambiguity regarding the optimal patient personalization of the therapy partly due to the fact that each empirical configuration of ablation lines made in a patient is irreversible during one ablation procedure. To investigate optimized ablation lesion line sets, in silico experimentation is an ideal solution. 3D computer models give us a unique advantage to plan and assess the effectiveness of different ablation strategies before and during RFCA. Reliability of in silico assessment is ensured by inclusion of accurate 3D atrial geometry, realistic fiber orientation, accurate fibrosis distribution and cellular kinetics; however, most of this detailed information in the current computer models is extrapolated from animal models and not from the human heart. The predictive power of computer models will increase as they are validated with human experimental and clinical data. To make the most from a computer model, one needs to develop 3D computer models based on the same functionally and structurally mapped intact human atria with high spatial resolution. The purpose of this review paper is to summarize recent developments in clinically-derived computer models and the clinical insights they provide for catheter ablation.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationComputer SimulationAnimalsAtrial FibrillationFibrosisHumansModels, CardiovascularPulmonary Veinsatrial fibrillationcardiac arrhythmiascatheter ablationcomputer modelfibrosispatient specific modelpulmonary vein isolationre-entryrotors

Identifiers

PMID25984605
PMCPMC4463678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.