Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25984456›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2015

Salt in the wound: (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography for identification of vulnerable coronary plaques.

Philip D Adamson, Alex T Vesey, Nik V Joshi, David E Newby, Marc R Dweck

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Simultaneous assessment of microcalcifications and morphological criteria of vulnerability in carotid artery plaque using hybridJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Vulnerable plaque imaging usingThe British journal of radiology · 2020
    Review
  5. Atherosclerosis imaging withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Review
  6. Coronary Atherosclerosis Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  7. Imaging aortic wall inflammation.Trends in cardiovascular medicine · 2019
    Review
  8. Three-Hour Delayed Imaging Improves Assessment of CoronaryJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Article
  9. Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2019
    Article
  10. Feasibility of CoronaryCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Assessment of atherosclerotic plaque calcification using F18-NaF PET-CT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018 · on this map
    Article
  14. Noninvasive Coronary Plaque Imaging.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Update on cardiovascular disease in lupus.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philip D AdamsonCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, Scotland.
Alex T VeseyCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, Scotland.
Nik V JoshiCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, Scotland.
David E NewbyCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, Scotland.
Marc R DweckCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, Scotland.
University of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/10/026/28209British Heart Foundation FS/13/77/30488British Heart Foundation FS/14/78/31020Chief Scientist Office ETM/160Medical Research Council G0701127Wellcome Trust 103782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischaemic vascular events occur in relation to an underlying vulnerable plaque. The pathological hallmarks of high-risk plaques are well described and include inflammation and microcalcification. To date, non-invasive imaging modalities have lacked the spatial resolution to detect these processes with the necessary precision to facilitate clinical utility. Positron emission tomography (PET) using targeted radiopharmaceuticals affords a highly sensitive tool for identifying features of interest and has been in use for several decades in oncological practice. Recent developments have created hybrid scanning platforms which add the detailed spatial resolution of computed tomography (CT) and, for the first time, made imaging of individual coronary plaques feasible. In this study we compared the utility of PET-CT using (18)F-fluoride and (18)F-fluorodeoxglucose ((18)F-FDG) to detect high-risk or ruptured atherosclerotic plaques in vivo. (18)F-fluoride localized to culprit and vulnerable plaques as determined by a combination of invasive imaging and histological tissue examination. In contradistinction, (18)F-FDG analysis was compromised by non-specific myocardial uptake that obscured the coronary arteries. We discuss the findings of this study, the limitations of the current approach of vulnerable plaque assessment and some on-going developments in cardiovascular imaging with (18)F-fluoride.

Indexed as

18F-fluoride PET-CT18F-fluorodeoxglucose PET-CT (18F-FDG PET-CT)atherosclerosismicrocalcificationVulnerable plaque

Identifiers

PMID25984456
PMCPMC4420673
OpenAlexW266369762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.