ArticleHealth economics review2015
Designing a package of sexual and reproductive health and HIV outreach services to meet the heterogeneous preferences of young people in Malawi: results from a discrete choice experiment.
Article in Health economics review, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Stated preferences of adolescents and young adults for sexual and reproductive health services in Africa: a systematic review.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Pooled it
- The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples' preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023Pooled it
- Current Practices for Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2022Pooled it
- Using discrete choice experiments to develop and deliver patient-centered psychological interventions: a systematic review.Health psychology review · 2021Pooled it
- Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.PharmacoEconomics · 2019Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators to sexual and reproductive health services among adolescents and young adults in Sidama region, Ethiopia: a qualitative study.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Article
- Preferences for HIV preexposure prophylaxis care among gay, bisexual, and other MSM: a large discrete choice experiment.AIDS (London, England) · 2025Article
- Stated preferences of adolescents and young adults for sexual and reproductive health services in Africa: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Preferences in adolescents and young people's sexual and reproductive health services in Nigeria: a discrete choice experiment.Health economics review · 2024Article
- Article
- Attributes development for a discrete choice experiment on preferences in sexual and reproductive health services for adolescents and young people in Nigeria.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Perceptions of Risks and Benefits of Participating in HIV Cure-Related Research Among Diverse Young Adults Living with HIV in the United States: Qualitative Research Findings.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2022Article
- Designing HIV Testing and Self-Testing Services for Young People in Nigeria: A Discrete Choice Experiment.The patient · 2021Article
- Preferences for transitional HIV care among people living with HIV recently released from prison in Zambia: a discrete choice experiment.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2021Article
- Heterogeneity in individual preferences for HIV testing: A systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments.EClinicalMedicine · 2020Article
- Preferences for family planning education among men and women in rural, highly religious Tanzanian communities: a discrete choice experiment.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2020Article
- The new contraceptive revolution: developing innovative products outside of industry†,‡.Biology of reproduction · 2020Review
- A Conjoint Analysis of the Acceptability of Targeted Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Therapy Among Persons Living with HIV in the U.S.AIDS and behavior · 2020Article
- Stated-preference research in HIV: A scoping review.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis article examines young people's preferences for integrated family planning (FP) and HIV services in rural Malawi. Different hypothetical configurations for outreach services are presented using a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). Responses are analysed using Random Parameters Logit and Generalised Mixed Logit (GMXL) models in preference space and a GMXL model parameterised in willingness-to-pay space. Simulations are used to estimate the proportion of respondents expected to choose different service packages as elements are varied individually and in combination.
resultsResponses were collected from 537 young people aged 15-24. Results show that when considering attending an outreach service to access family planning young people value confidentiality and the availability of HIV services including HIV counselling and testing (HCT) and HIV treatment, though significant observable and unobservable heterogeneity is present. Female respondents and those aged 20-24 were less concerned with service confidentiality compared to male respondents and those aged 15-19; respondents who were in a relationship at the time of the survey valued confidentiality more than those who reported being single. The addition of sports and recreation for young people may also be an attractive feature of a youth-friendly service; however, preferences for this attribute vary according to respondent gender. Results of the simulation modelling indicate that the most preferred service package is one that offers confidential services, both HCT and HIV treatment and sports for youth, with up to 32% of respondents expected to choose this service over a service where clients may have concerns over confidentiality, only HCT is available and there are no additional activities for young people. Estimates of willingness-to-pay for service attributes indicate that respondents were willing to pay up to USD$1.76 for confidentiality, USD$0.65 for a service offering both HCT and HIV treatment and USD$0.26 for a service including sports for youth.
conclusionsYoung people were able to complete a complex DCE and appeared to trade between the different characteristics used to describe the outreach services. These findings may offer important insight to policy makers designing youth friendly SRH outreach services and providers aiming to improve the acceptability and uptake of FP services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.