Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25983759›Full record

ArticleCanadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC2015

BC Medication Management Project: Perspectives of pharmacists, patients and physicians.

Natalie Henrich, Nicole Tsao, Louise Gastonguay, Larry Lynd, Carlo A Marra

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Geographical access to community pharmacies in British Columbia, Canada.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Medication Therapy Management: Current Challenges.Integrated pharmacy research & practice · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Opinions and preferences of British Columbia pharmacists and physicians on medication management services.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
  7. Community pharmacists' experiences with the Saskatchewan Medication Assessment Program.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
  8. Impact of pharmacist-led medication assessments on opioid utilization.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
  9. Impact of pharmacist-led medication assessments on medication costs.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalie HenrichCentre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences (Henrich), Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Nicole TsaoCentre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences (Henrich), Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Louise GastonguayCentre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences (Henrich), Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Larry LyndCentre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences (Henrich), Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Carlo A MarraCentre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences (Henrich), Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe BC Medication Management Project (BCMMP) was developed by the BC Ministry of Health and the BC Pharmacy Association. This pilot project ran from September 2010 to January 2012. Pharmacists reviewed patients' medication histories, discussed best use of medications, provided education and monitored for adverse effects, developed a plan to deal with medication issues and created a best possible medication history.

methodsTo evaluate the experience of participating in the BCMMP, challenges and strengths of the project and the alignment of these experiences with the overarching goals, focus groups and interviews were conducted with 6 stakeholder groups. Themes were compared within and across stakeholder type and descriptively analyzed.

resultsA total of 88 people participated in the focus groups/interviews. Pharmacists stated that providing BCMMP services was professionally satisfying and concurred with patients that the service did benefit them. However, participating in the BCMMP was not seen as financially sustainable by pharmacy owners, and there were concerns about patient selection. Physicians expressed concerns about increased workload associated with the BCMMP, for which they were not compensated. The computer system and burden of documentation were identified as the greatest problems.

conclusionsThe BCMMP pilot project was enthusiastically received by pharmacists and patients who felt that it benefited patients and moved the pharmacy profession in a positive direction. It was widely felt that the BCMMP could be successful and sustainable if the identified challenges are addressed.

Identifiers

PMID25983759
PMCPMC4366408
OpenAlexW2086492640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.