Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25983743›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2015

Telomere DNA recognition in Saccharomycotina yeast: potential lessons for the co-evolution of ssDNA and dsDNA-binding proteins and their target sites.

Olga Steinberg-Neifach, Neal F Lue

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Translocation within thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Investigating the role of G-quadruplexes atMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olga Steinberg-NeifachDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, W. R. Hearst Microbiology Research Center, Weill Medical College, Cornell University , New York, NY, USA ; Hostos Community College, City University of New York , Bronx, NY, USA.
Neal F LueDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, W. R. Hearst Microbiology Research Center, Weill Medical College, Cornell University , New York, NY, USA.
Hearst (United States) · US

Funding

Telomere terminal extension and replication: mechanisms and links to DNA repair - SupplementR01GM107287 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LUE, NEAL F · 2014 to 2023
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In principle, alterations in the telomere repeat sequence would be expected to disrupt the protective nucleoprotein complexes that confer stability to chromosome ends, and hence relatively rare events in evolution. Indeed, numerous organisms in diverse phyla share a canonical 6 bp telomere repeat unit (5'-TTAGGG-3'/5'-CCCTAA-3'), suggesting common descent from an ancestor that carries this particular repeat. All the more remarkable, then, are the extraordinarily divergent telomere sequences that populate the Saccharomycotina subphylum of budding yeast. These sequences are distinguished from the canonical telomere repeat in being long, occasionally degenerate, and frequently non-G/C-rich. Despite the divergent telomere repeat sequences, studies to date indicate that the same families of single-strand and double-strand telomere binding proteins (i.e., the Cdc13 and Rap1 families) are responsible for telomere protection in Saccharomycotina yeast. The recognition mechanisms of the protein family members therefore offer an informative paradigm for understanding the co-evolution of DNA-binding proteins and the cognate target sequences. Existing data suggest three potential, inter-related solutions to the DNA recognition problem: (i) duplication of the recognition protein and functional modification; (ii) combinatorial recognition of target site; and (iii) flexibility of the recognition surfaces of the DNA-binding proteins to adopt alternative conformations. Evidence in support of these solutions and the relevance of these solutions to other DNA-protein regulatory systems are discussed.

Indexed as

Cdc13co-evolution of DNA and binding proteinsdimerizationgene duplicationRap1Saccharomycotinatelomeretelomere-binding proteins

Identifiers

PMID25983743
PMCPMC4416457
OpenAlexW1974713875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.