Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25983679›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neural circuits2015

Animal models of spontaneous activity in the healthy and impaired auditory system.

Jos J Eggermont

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Auditory attentional filter in the absence of masking noise.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021
    Article
  5. Consilience in the Peripheral Sensory Adaptation Response.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  6. Nitric Oxide Signaling in the Auditory Pathway.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. GABAJournal of neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Noise-Induced Hypersensitization of the Acoustic Startle Response in Larval Zebrafish.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Increased Synchrony and Bursting of Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Fusiform Cells Correlate with Tinnitus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jos J EggermontDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Department of Psychology, University of Calgary Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous neural activity in the auditory nerve fibers and in auditory cortex in healthy animals is discussed with respect to the question: Is spontaneous activity noise or information carrier? The studies reviewed suggest strongly that spontaneous activity is a carrier of information. Subsequently, I review the numerous findings in the impaired auditory system, particularly with reference to noise trauma and tinnitus. Here the common assumption is that tinnitus reflects increased noise in the auditory system that among others affects temporal processing and interferes with the gap-startle reflex, which is frequently used as a behavioral assay for tinnitus. It is, however, more likely that the increased spontaneous activity in tinnitus, firing rate as well as neural synchrony, carries information that shapes the activity of downstream structures, including non-auditory ones, and leading to the tinnitus percept. The main drivers of that process are bursting and synchronous firing, which facilitates transfer of activity across synapses, and allows formation of auditory objects, such as tinnitus.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysDisease Models, AnimalHearing Loss, Noise-InducedTinnitusauditory cortexauditory nerveburst firinginferior colliculusneural synchronynoise traumaspontaneous firing ratetinnitus

Identifiers

PMID25983679
PMCPMC4415415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.