Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25983612›Full record

ArticleEvaluation (London, England : 1995)2014

Strengthening patient-centred communication in rural Ugandan health centres: A theory-driven evaluation within a cluster randomized trial.

Susan Nayiga, Deborah DiLiberto, Lilian Taaka, Christine Nabirye, Ane Haaland, Sarah G Staedke, Clare I R Chandler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evaluation (London, England : 1995), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susan NayigaInfectious Disease Research Collaboration, Uganda.
Deborah DiLibertoLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.
Lilian TaakaInfectious Disease Research Collaboration, Uganda.
Christine NabiryeInfectious Disease Research Collaboration, Uganda.
Ane HaalandUniversity of Oslo, Norway.
Sarah G StaedkeLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.
Clare I R ChandlerLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article describes a theory-driven evaluation of one component of an intervention to improve the quality of health care at Ugandan public health centres. Patient-centred services have been advocated widely, but such approaches have received little attention in Africa. A cluster randomized trial is evaluating population-level outcomes of an intervention with multiple components, including 'patient-centred services.' A process evaluation was designed within this trial to articulate and evaluate the implementation and programme theories of the intervention. This article evaluates one hypothesized mechanism of change within the programme theory: the impact of the Patient Centred Services component on health-worker communication. The theory-driven approach extended to evaluation of the outcome measures. The study found that the proximal outcome of patient-centred communication was rated 10 percent higher (

Indexed as

Africacomplex interventionpatient centred communicationquality of health caretheory-driven evaluation

Identifiers

PMID25983612
PMCPMC4425297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.