Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25983589›Full record

ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2015

Individual versus Standardized Running Protocols in the Determination of VO2max.

Paula F Sperlich, Hans-Christer Holmberg, Jennifer L Reed, Christoph Zinner, Joachim Mester, Billy Sperlich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Maximal lactate accumulation rate (European journal of applied physiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Maximal Heart Rate for Swimmers.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Graded Exercise Testing Protocols for the Determination of VOJournal of sports medicine (Hindawi Publishing Corporation) · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paula F SperlichInstitute of Training Science and Sport Informatics, German Sport University Cologne , Germany ; German Research Centre of Elite Sports, German Sport University Cologne , Germany.
Hans-Christer HolmbergSwedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University , Östersund, Sweden.
Jennifer L ReedMinto Prevention and Rehabilitation Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute , Canada.
Christoph ZinnerDepartment of Sport Science, University of Würzburg , Germany.
Joachim MesterInstitute of Training Science and Sport Informatics, German Sport University Cologne , Germany ; German Research Centre of Elite Sports, German Sport University Cologne , Germany.
Billy SperlichDepartment of Sport Science, University of Würzburg , Germany.

Funding

Cincinnati Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences and TrainingUL1TR000077 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E. · 2012 to 2014
$9.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether an individually designed incremental exercise protocol results in greater rates of oxygen uptake (VO2max) than standardized testing. Fourteen well-trained, male runners performed five incremental protocols in randomized order to measure their VO2max: i) an incremental test (INCS+I) with pre-defined increases in speed (2 min at 8.64 km·h(-1), then a rise of 1.44 km·h(-1) every 30 s up to 14.4 km·h(-1)) and thereafter inclination (0.5° every 30 s); ii) an incremental test (INCI) at constant speed (14.4 km·h(-1)) and increasing inclination (2° every 2 min from the initial 0°); iii) an incremental test (INCS) at constant inclination (0°) and increasing speed (0.5 km·h(-1) every 30 s from the initial 12.0 km·h(-1)); iv) a graded exercise protocol (GXP) at a 1° incline with increasing speed (initially 8.64 km·h(-1) + 1.44 km·h(-1) every 5 min); v) an individual exercise protocol (INDXP) in which the runner chose the inclination and speed. VO2max was lowest (-4.2%) during the GXP (p = 0.01; d = 0.06-0.61) compared to all other tests. The highest rating of perceived exertion, heart rate, ventilation and end-exercise blood lactate concentration were similar between the different protocols (p < 0.05). The time to exhaustion ranged from 7 min 18 sec (INCS) to 25 min 30 sec (GXP) (p = 0.01).The VO2max attained by employing an individual treadmill protocol does not differ from the values derived from various standardized incremental protocols. Key pointsThe mean maximum oxygen uptake during the GXP was lower than for all other tests.Differences in the maximum rate of oxygen uptake between the various protocols exhibited considerable inter-individual variation.From the current findings, it can be concluded that well trained athletes are able to perform an individually designed treadmill running protocol.

Indexed as

aerobic powerMaximum oxygen uptakeramp testtreadmill protocoltreadmill running

Identifiers

PMID25983589
PMCPMC4424469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.