Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25983543›Full record

ArticleCancer informatics2015

Selecting spatial scale of covariates in regression models of environmental exposures.

Lauren P Grant, Chris Gennings, David C Wheeler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Modeling Pediatric Body Mass Index and Neighborhood Environment at Different Spatial Scales.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren P GrantVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Chris GenningsIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
David C WheelerVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

The Mount Sinai Transdisciplinary Center on Early Environmental ExposuresP30ES023515 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Maria Jose Rosa · 2014 to 2026
$21.3M
Integration of Mixtures Toxicology, Toxicogenomics, and StatisticsT32ES007334 · NIEHS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI WHEELER, DAVID CHARLES · 2002 to 2018
$2.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES023515NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental factors or socioeconomic status variables used in regression models to explain environmental chemical exposures or health outcomes are often in practice modeled at the same buffer distance or spatial scale. In this paper, we present four model selection algorithms that select the best spatial scale for each buffer-based or area-level covariate. Contamination of drinking water by nitrate is a growing problem in agricultural areas of the United States, as ingested nitrate can lead to the endogenous formation of N-nitroso compounds, which are potent carcinogens. We applied our methods to model nitrate levels in private wells in Iowa. We found that environmental variables were selected at different spatial scales and that a model allowing spatial scale to vary across covariates provided the best goodness of fit. Our methods can be applied to investigate the association between environmental risk factors available at multiple spatial scales or buffer distances and measures of disease, including cancers.

Indexed as

cancer risk factorsenvironmentmodel selectionnitratespatial scale

Identifiers

PMID25983543
PMCPMC4413908
OpenAlexW2002890092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.