Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25983396›Full record

ReviewTrees (Berlin, Germany : West)

Prospects and limitations of microbial pesticides for control of bacterial and fungal pomefruit tree diseases.

A Bonaterra, E Badosa, J Cabrefiga, J Francés, E Montesinos

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trees (Berlin, Germany : West). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An Overview of MajorJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Grapevine response to aFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Influence of Bacterial Competitors onFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A BonaterraInstitute of Food and Agricultural Technology-XaRTA-CIDSAV, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi s/n, 17071 Girona, Spain.
E BadosaInstitute of Food and Agricultural Technology-XaRTA-CIDSAV, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi s/n, 17071 Girona, Spain.
J CabrefigaInstitute of Food and Agricultural Technology-XaRTA-CIDSAV, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi s/n, 17071 Girona, Spain.
J FrancésInstitute of Food and Agricultural Technology-XaRTA-CIDSAV, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi s/n, 17071 Girona, Spain.
E MontesinosInstitute of Food and Agricultural Technology-XaRTA-CIDSAV, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi s/n, 17071 Girona, Spain.
University of Girona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tree constitutes an ecosystem in which microorganisms play an essential role in its functionality. Interactions that microorganisms establish with plants may be beneficial or detrimental and are of extreme importance in the exploitation of trees in agriculture as crop production systems. Fruit trees, especially pomefruit trees including apple, pear and several ornamentals are of great economic importance but its production is affected by several diseases. Fungal and bacterial fruit tree diseases are mainly controlled with chemical fungicides and bactericides, but health and environmental concerns about the use of chemical pesticides have result in strong regulatory actions and have stimulated the development of beneficial microorganisms as microbial pesticides. Up to now, several microorganisms have been registered in different countries and in the EU as biocontrol agents (BCA) covering mainly fire blight, soil-borne fungal diseases and postharvest fruit fungal rot. The key aspects in the success of this technology for disease control are related to biosafety and environmental impact of biocontrol agents, the traceability and fate in the environment and food chain, the improvement by physiological, genetic engineering or the use of mixtures or formulations as well as the industrial production and development of delivery systems for treatment application to trees.

Indexed as

BiosafetyDeliveryEnvironmental impactFormulationGenetic engineeringMicrobial pesticidesPhysiological improvement

Identifiers

PMID25983396
PMCPMC4425264
OpenAlexW2079254656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.