Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25983246›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2015

Concurrent whole-genome haplotyping and copy-number profiling of single cells.

Masoud Zamani Esteki, Eftychia Dimitriadou, Ligia Mateiu, Cindy Melotte, Niels Van der Aa, Parveen Kumar, Rakhi Das, Koen Theunis, Jiqiu Cheng, Eric Legius and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Masoud Zamani EstekiCentre for Human Genetics, University Hospital Leuven, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Eftychia DimitriadouCentre for Human Genetics, University Hospital Leuven, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Ligia MateiuCentre for Human Genetics, University Hospital Leuven, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Cindy MelotteCentre for Human Genetics, University Hospital Leuven, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Niels Van der AaCentre for Human Genetics, University Hospital Leuven, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Parveen KumarCentre for Human Genetics, University Hospital Leuven, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Rakhi DasCentre for Human Genetics, University Hospital Leuven, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Koen TheunisCentre for Human Genetics, University Hospital Leuven, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Jiqiu ChengCentre for Human Genetics, University Hospital Leuven, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT-STADIUS, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Eric LegiusCentre for Human Genetics, University Hospital Leuven, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Yves MoreauDepartment of Electrical Engineering, ESAT-STADIUS, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Sophie DebrockLeuven University Fertility Center, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Thomas D'HoogheLeuven University Fertility Center, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Pieter VerdyckCentre for Medical Genetics, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Martine De RyckeCentre for Medical Genetics, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium; Research group Reproduction and Genetics (REGE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Karen SermonResearch group Reproduction and Genetics (REGE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Joris R VermeeschCentre for Human Genetics, University Hospital Leuven, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: joris.vermeesch@med.kuleuven.be.
Thierry VoetCentre for Human Genetics, University Hospital Leuven, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Single-cell Genomics Centre, Welcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK. Electronic address: thierry.voet@med.kuleuven.be.
KU Leuven · BECentre For Human Genetics · INVrije Universiteit Brussel · BEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BEWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methods for haplotyping and DNA copy-number typing of single cells are paramount for studying genomic heterogeneity and enabling genetic diagnosis. Before analyzing the DNA of a single cell by microarray or next-generation sequencing, a whole-genome amplification (WGA) process is required, but it substantially distorts the frequency and composition of the cell's alleles. As a consequence, haplotyping methods suffer from error-prone discrete SNP genotypes (AA, AB, BB) and DNA copy-number profiling remains difficult because true DNA copy-number aberrations have to be discriminated from WGA artifacts. Here, we developed a single-cell genome analysis method that reconstructs genome-wide haplotype architectures as well as the copy-number and segregational origin of those haplotypes by employing phased parental genotypes and deciphering WGA-distorted SNP B-allele fractions via a process we coin haplarithmisis. We demonstrate that the method can be applied as a generic method for preimplantation genetic diagnosis on single cells biopsied from human embryos, enabling diagnosis of disease alleles genome wide as well as numerical and structural chromosomal anomalies. Moreover, meiotic segregation errors can be distinguished from mitotic ones.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, GeneticChromosome AberrationsDNA PrimersGene DosageGenome, HumanGenotypeHaplotypesHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePreimplantation DiagnosisSingle-Cell AnalysisStatistics, NonparametricDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID25983246
PMCPMC4473724
OpenAlexW1493909984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.