Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25983023›Full record

ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2015

Association of fludarabine pharmacokinetic/dynamic biomarkers with donor chimerism in nonmyeloablative HCT recipients.

Jeannine S McCune, Donald E Mager, Meagan J Bemer, Brenda M Sandmaier, Barry E Storer, Shelly Heimfeld

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Pharmacokinetics and Model-Based Dosing to Optimize Fludarabine Therapy in Pediatric Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2017
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeannine S McCuneClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA, jmccune@u.washington.edu.
Donald E Mager
Meagan J Bemer
Brenda M Sandmaier
Barry E Storer
Shelly Heimfeld
University of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Eric Collisson · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
VIRUS-MEDIATED MYELOSUPPRESSIONP01CA018029 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Geoffrey Roger HILL · 1985 to 2026
$128.4M
Project 3: Stem Cell Allografts for Lymphoid MalignanciesP01CA078902 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI SANDMAIER, BRENDA MARIE · 1999 to 2025
$46.1M
UNRELATED AND HLA-MISMATCHED RELATED DONOR TRANSPLANTSP01HL036444 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RAWLINGS, DAVID J · 1986 to 2010
$25.9M
CORE--VECTOR PRODUCTIONP30DK056465 · NIDDK · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BERNSTEIN, IRWIN D · 1999 to 2014
$14.9M
Stem Cell and Transplantation BiologyU54DK106829 · NIDDK · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI DEREK L STIREWALT · 2015 to 2026
$9.1M
Resource Facility for Population KineticsP41EB001975 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FOSTER, DAVID M · 2003 to 2007
$4.9M
Population Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics in Nonablative Stem Cell RecipientsR01HL091744 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MCCUNE, JEANNINE S · 2008 to 2011
$2.0M
Infections in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant RecipientsK24HL093294 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BOECKH, MICHAEL J · 2009 to 2019
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA15704NCI NIH HHS CA18029NCI NIH HHS CA78902NCI NIH HHS P01 CA018029NCI NIH HHS P01 CA078902NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NHLBI NIH HHS HL36444NHLBI NIH HHS HL91744NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL093294NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL036444NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091744NIBIB NIH HHS EB001975NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB001975NIDDK NIH HHS DK56465NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056465NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK106829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFludarabine monophosphate (fludarabine) is an integral component of many reduced-intensity conditioning regimens for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Fludarabine's metabolite, 9-β-D-arabinofuranosyl-2-fluoroadenine (F-ara-A), undergoes cellular uptake and activation to form the active cytotoxic metabolite fludarabine triphosphate (F-ara-ATP), which inhibits cellular DNA synthesis in CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells. In this study, we evaluated whether fludarabine-based pharmacologic biomarkers were associated with clinical outcomes in HCT recipients.

methodsParticipants with hematologic diseases were conditioned with fludarabine and low-dose total body irradiation (TBI) followed by allogeneic HCT and post-grafting immunosuppression. After fludarabine administration, we evaluated pharmacological biomarkers for fludarabine-F-ara-A area under the curve (AUC) and the ratio of circulating CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells (CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio) after fludarabine administration-in 102 patients; F-ara-ATP accumulation rate in enriched CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells was evaluated in 36 and 34 patients, respectively.

resultsInterpatient variability in the pharmacological biomarkers was high, ranging from 3.7-fold (F-ara-A AUC) to 39-fold (F-ara-ATP in CD8(+) cells). Circulating CD8(+) cells were more sensitive to fludarabine administration. A population pharmacokinetic-based sampling schedule successfully allowed for estimation of F-ara-A AUC in this outpatient population. There was a poor correlation between the F-ara-AUC and the F-ara-ATP accumulation rate in CD4(+) (R (2) = 0.01) and CD8(+) cells (R (2) = 0.00). No associations were seen between the four biomarkers and clinical outcomes (day +28 donor T cell chimerism, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), neutrophil nadirs, cytomegalovirus reactivation, chronic GVHD, relapse, non-relapse mortality, or overall mortality).

conclusionsConsiderable interpatient variability exists in pharmacokinetic and fludarabine-based biomarkers, but these biomarkers are not associated with clinical outcomes in fludarabine/TBI-conditioned patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTransplantation ChimeraTransplantation ConditioningVidarabineYoung AdultAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorfludarabineVidarabine

Identifiers

PMID25983023
PMCPMC4489995
OpenAlexW216662827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.